284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25603807)
1. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents.
Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Yilmaz H; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Mendes Pereira V
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Mar; 8(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 25603807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic transition driven by stent porosity in sidewall aneurysms.
Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Pereira VM
J Biomech; 2015 May; 48(7):1300-9. PubMed ID: 25798761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design.
Bouillot P; Brina O; Ouared R; Lovblad KO; Farhat M; Pereira VM
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e113762. PubMed ID: 25470724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A pilot validation of CFD model results against PIV observations of haemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents.
Li Y; Verrelli DI; Yang W; Qian Y; Chong W
J Biomech; 2020 Feb; 100():109590. PubMed ID: 31902608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of patient-specific hemodynamic models of stented intracranial aneurysms: report on the Virtual Intracranial Stenting Challenge 2011.
Cito S; Geers AJ; Arroyo MP; Palero VR; Pallarés J; Vernet A; Blasco J; San Román L; Fu W; Qiao A; Janiga G; Miura Y; Ohta M; Mendina M; Usera G; Frangi AF
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Jan; 43(1):154-67. PubMed ID: 25118668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.
Roloff C; Stucht D; Beuing O; Berg P
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Mar; 11(3):275-282. PubMed ID: 30061369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models.
Ford MD; Nikolov HN; Milner JS; Lownie SP; Demont EM; Kalata W; Loth F; Holdsworth DW; Steinman DA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021015. PubMed ID: 18412502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of parameters for evaluating flow reduction with stents in a sidewall aneurysm phantom model.
Yu CH; Kwon TK
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2417-24. PubMed ID: 25226942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Particle Image Velocimetry Used to Qualitatively Validate Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations in an Oxygenator: A Proof of Concept.
Schlanstein PC; Hesselmann F; Jansen SV; Gemsa J; Kaufmann TA; Klaas M; Roggenkamp D; Schröder W; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Arens J
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2015 Sep; 6(3):340-51. PubMed ID: 26577365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Measurements of blood velocities using duplex sonography in carotid artery stents: analysis of reliability in an in-vitro model and computational fluid dynamics (CFD)].
Schönwald UG; Jorczyk U; Kipfmüller B
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S89-94. PubMed ID: 19941251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-aneurysmal flow rates are reduced by two flow diverters: an experiment using tomographic particle image velocimetry in an aneurysm model.
Dennis KD; Rossman TL; Kallmes DF; Dragomir-Daescu D
J Neurointerv Surg; 2015 Dec; 7(12):937-42. PubMed ID: 25280567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic alterations by a self-expandable intracranial stent and flow diversion stent: high intra-aneurysmal pressure remains regardless of flow velocity reduction.
Shobayashi Y; Tateshima S; Kakizaki R; Sudo R; Tanishita K; Viñuela F
J Neurointerv Surg; 2013 Nov; 5 Suppl 3():iii38-42. PubMed ID: 23048176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental Approach to Visualize Flow in a Stacked Hollow Fiber Bundle of an Artificial Lung With Particle Image Velocimetry.
Kaesler A; Schlanstein PC; Hesselmann F; Büsen M; Klaas M; Roggenkamp D; Schmitz-Rode T; Steinseifer U; Arens J
Artif Organs; 2017 Jun; 41(6):529-538. PubMed ID: 27925231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hemodynamic Study of a Patient-Specific Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparative Assessment of Tomographic PIV, Stereoscopic PIV, In Vivo MRI and Computational Fluid Dynamics.
Wu X; Gürzing S; Schinkel C; Toussaint M; Perinajová R; van Ooij P; Kenjereš S
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2022 Jun; 13(3):428-442. PubMed ID: 34750782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stent porosity on hemodynamics in a sidewall aneurysm model.
Liou TM; Li YC
J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1174-83. PubMed ID: 18377914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Porosity dependency of an optimized stent design for an intracranial aneurysm.
Anzai H; Yoshida Y; Sugiyama S; Endo H; Matsumoto Y; Ohta M
Technol Health Care; 2015; 23(5):547-56. PubMed ID: 26410116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
