These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25604642)

  • 1. The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.
    Chow M; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 25604642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():14-25. PubMed ID: 24793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model comparison approach reveals individual variation in the scope and control of attention.
    Schor D; Brodersen AS; Gibson BS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1006-1013. PubMed ID: 32514801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):853-65. PubMed ID: 25436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in the use of cues to guide visual working memory.
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1652-1665. PubMed ID: 28547679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of strategy on visual working memory capacity.
    Bengson JJ; Luck SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 26139356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The unique contributions of the facilitation of procedural memory and working memory to individual differences in intelligence.
    Was CA; Dunlosky J; Bailey H; Rawson KA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):425-33. PubMed ID: 22321455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jun; 71():1-26. PubMed ID: 24531497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fluid intelligence is related to capacity in memory as well as attention: Evidence from middle childhood and adulthood.
    Cochrane A; Simmering V; Green CS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221353. PubMed ID: 31437203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in parietal and frontal cortex structure predict dissociable capacities for perception and cognitive control.
    Eayrs JO; Lavie N
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116148. PubMed ID: 31476428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention.
    Shipstead Z; Harrison TL; Engle RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1863-80. PubMed ID: 25911154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The domain-specific and domain-general relationships of visuospatial working memory to reasoning ability.
    Shipstead Z; Yonehiro J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1504-1512. PubMed ID: 26975608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in rate of encoding predict estimates of visual short-term memory capacity (K).
    Jannati A; McDonald JJ; Di Lollo V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Jun; 69(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 25774996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.
    Redick TS; Shipstead Z; Harrison TL; Hicks KL; Fried DE; Hambrick DZ; Kane MJ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):359-79. PubMed ID: 22708717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 26450588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the division of working memory and long-term memory and their relation to intelligence: A latent variable approach.
    Unsworth N
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 20022311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Encoding strategy accounts for individual differences in change detection measures of VSTM.
    Linke AC; Vicente-Grabovetsky A; Mitchell DJ; Cusack R
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 May; 49(6):1476-86. PubMed ID: 21130789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opposite effects of capacity load and resolution load on distractor processing.
    Zhang W; Luck SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 25365573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.
    Olivers CN; Peters J; Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):327-34. PubMed ID: 21665518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.