These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25604650)
1. Questionnaire design: carry-over effects of overall acceptance question placement and pre-evaluation instructions on overall acceptance scores in central location tests. Bastian M; Eggett DL; Jefferies LK J Food Sci; 2015 Feb; 80(2):S435-43. PubMed ID: 25604650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identifying drivers for consumer acceptance and purchase intent of corn tortilla. Herrera-Corredor JA; Saidu JE; Khachatryan A; Prinyawiwatkul W; Carballo-Carballo A; Zepeda-Bautista R J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):S727-31. PubMed ID: 18034760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of the Engagement Questionnaire (EQ) to compare methodological differences in sensory and consumer testing. Hannum ME; Forzley S; Popper R; Simons CT Food Res Int; 2021 Feb; 140():110083. PubMed ID: 33648301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumers with high frequency of 'just about right' in JAR scales may use lower cognitive effort: Evidence from the concurrent 9-point hedonic scale and CATA question. Song J; Xia Y; Zhong F Food Res Int; 2021 May; 143():110285. PubMed ID: 33992385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean traditional barbecued beef). Hong JH; Yoon EK; Chung SJ; Chung L; Cha SM; O'Mahony M; Vickers Z; Kim KO J Food Sci; 2011; 76(5):S306-13. PubMed ID: 22417445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visually suboptimal bananas: How ripeness affects consumer expectation and perception. Symmank C; Zahn S; Rohm H Appetite; 2018 Jan; 120():472-481. PubMed ID: 29017908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different Oils and Health Benefit Statements Affect Physicochemical Properties, Consumer Liking, Emotion, and Purchase Intent: A Case of Sponge Cake. Poonnakasem N; Pujols KD; Chaiwanichsiri S; Laohasongkram K; Prinyawiwatkul W J Food Sci; 2016 Jan; 81(1):S165-73. PubMed ID: 26661685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Texture-modified 3D printed dark chocolate: Sensory evaluation and consumer perception study. Mantihal S; Prakash S; Bhandari B J Texture Stud; 2019 Oct; 50(5):386-399. PubMed ID: 31323141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acceptance and purchase intent of US consumers for nonwheat rice butter cakes. Sae-Eaw A; Chompreeda P; Prinyawiwatkul W; Haruthaithanasan V; Suwonsichon T; Saidu JE; Xu Z J Food Sci; 2007 Mar; 72(2):S92-7. PubMed ID: 17995861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks. Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC J Anim Sci; 2003 Nov; 81(11):2741-50. PubMed ID: 14601877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of adjuncts on sensory properties and consumer liking of Scamorza cheese. Braghieri A; Piazzolla N; Romaniello A; Paladino F; Ricciardi A; Napolitano F J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1479-91. PubMed ID: 25465632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drivers of high-involvement consumers' intention to buy PDO wines: Valpolicella PDO case study. Capitello R; Agnoli L; Begalli D J Sci Food Agric; 2016 Aug; 96(10):3407-17. PubMed ID: 26538481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the validity of longitudinal comparisons of central location consumer testing results prior to COVID-19 versus home use testing data during the pandemic. Shi M; Stelick A; Licker S; Dando R J Food Sci; 2021 Oct; 86(10):4668-4677. PubMed ID: 34533213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumer perception of salt-reduced breads: Comparison of single and two-bites evaluation. Antúnez L; Giménez A; Alcaire F; Vidal L; Ares G Food Res Int; 2017 Oct; 100(Pt 1):254-259. PubMed ID: 28873685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of reference foods in repeated acceptability tests: testing familiar and novel foods using 2 acceptability scales. El Dine AN; Olabi A J Food Sci; 2009 Mar; 74(2):S97-106. PubMed ID: 19323773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of static and dynamic sensory product characterizations based on check-all-that-apply questions with consumers. Alcaire F; Antúnez L; Vidal L; Zorn S; Giménez A; Castura JC; Ares G Food Res Int; 2017 Jul; 97():215-222. PubMed ID: 28578044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors that predict consumer acceptance of enriched processed meats. Shan LC; Henchion M; De Brún A; Murrin C; Wall PG; Monahan FJ Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():185-193. PubMed ID: 28711465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of functional milk desserts enriched with resistant starch based on consumers' perception. Ares F; Arrarte E; De León T; Ares G; Gámbaro A Food Sci Technol Int; 2012 Oct; 18(5):465-75. PubMed ID: 23144240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of a check-all-that-apply question for the evaluation of strawberry cultivars from a breeding program. Lado J; Vicente E; Manzzioni A; Ares G J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Oct; 90(13):2268-75. PubMed ID: 20648524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceived Correspondence of Health Effects as a New Determinant Influencing Purchase Intention for Functional Food. Temesi Á; Bacsó Á; Grunert KG; Lakner Z Nutrients; 2019 Mar; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 30934965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]