These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

943 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25604832)

  • 1. Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.
    Corcelles R; Daigle CR; Talamas HR; Brethauer SA; Schauer PR
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2015; 11(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 25604832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Quality Assessment of the Information Accessible to Patients on the Internet About the Whipple Procedure.
    Khachfe HH; Chahrour MA; Habib JR; Yu J; Jamali FR
    World J Surg; 2021 Jun; 45(6):1853-1859. PubMed ID: 33580299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perthes Disease: The Quality and Reliability of Information on the Internet.
    Nassiri M; Bruce-Brand RA; O'Neill F; Chenouri S; Curtin P
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015; 35(5):530-5. PubMed ID: 25254387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the quality and content of information on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the internet.
    Bruce-Brand RA; Baker JF; Byrne DP; Hogan NA; McCarthy T
    Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1095-100. PubMed ID: 23582738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross sectional analysis of scoliosis-specific information on the internet: potential for patient confusion and misinformation.
    Truumees D; Duncan A; Mayer EK; Geck M; Singh D; Truumees E
    Spine Deform; 2020 Dec; 8(6):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 32578159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hydrocele on the web: an evaluation of Internet-based information.
    Nason GJ; Tareen F; Quinn F
    Scand J Urol; 2013 Apr; 47(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 22954253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Osteotomy around the knee: Assessment of quality, content and readability of online information.
    Broderick JM; McCarthy A; Hogan N
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():139-150. PubMed ID: 33360380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-targeted websites on overactive bladder: What are our patients reading?
    Clancy AA; Hickling D; Didomizio L; Sanaee M; Shehata F; Zee R; Khalil H
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Feb; 37(2):832-841. PubMed ID: 28762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.
    Lim SJM; Kelly M; Selvarajah L; Murray M; Scanlon T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):149. PubMed ID: 33952225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality, Accuracy, and Reliability of Internet Websites about Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.
    Saleh D; Fisher JH; Provencher S; Liang Z; Ryerson CJ; Weatherald J
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2022 Aug; 19(8):1404-1413. PubMed ID: 34813417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internet-Based Resources Frequently Provide Inaccurate and Out-of-Date Recommendations on Preoperative Fasting: A Systematic Review.
    Roughead T; Sewell D; Ryerson CJ; Fisher JH; Flexman AM
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Dec; 123(6):1463-1468. PubMed ID: 27644057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Internet Websites for Chest Pain Symptoms Demonstrate Highly Variable Content and Quality.
    Joury AU; Alshathri M; Alkhunaizi M; Jaleesah N; Pines JM
    Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1146-1152. PubMed ID: 27341392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and readability of online patient information on the left ventricular assist device.
    Rouhi AD; Han JJ; Ghanem YK; Pervaiz SS; Suarez-Pierre A; Choudhury RA; Bermudez CA; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 47(6):1029-1037. PubMed ID: 36478254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the reliability and quality of online uterine fibroid embolization resources.
    Kaicker J; Wu K; Athreya S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Apr; 36(2):385-94. PubMed ID: 22648699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Readability and Quality of Web-Based Patient Information on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Quantitative Content Analysis.
    Tan DJY; Ko TK; Fan KS
    JMIR Form Res; 2023 Nov; 7():e47762. PubMed ID: 38010802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients : The Internet as an information source.
    Janssen S; Käsmann L; Fahlbusch FB; Rades D; Vordermark D
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2018 Feb; 194(2):136-142. PubMed ID: 28856383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online information for incisional hernia repair: What are patients reading?
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Bader E; Hoeltzel GD; Joshi ART; Williams NN; Dumon KR
    Surgeon; 2023 Aug; 21(4):e195-e200. PubMed ID: 36588086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and readability assessment of online patient information on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
    Rouhi AD; Ghanem YK; Hoeltzel GD; Miura JT; Aarons CB; Williams NN; Dumon KR; Karakousis GC
    J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 127(4):699-705. PubMed ID: 36394434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.