These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25604854)

  • 1. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
    Jelsig AM; Qvist N; Brusgaard K; Ousager LB
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1423-6. PubMed ID: 25604854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Considering Actionability at the Participant's Research Setting Level for Anticipatable Incidental Findings from Clinical Research.
    Ortiz-Osorno AB; Ehler LA; Brooks J
    J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):619-32. PubMed ID: 26479571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience.
    Bishop CL; Strong KA; Dimmock DP
    Clin Genet; 2017 Jan; 91(1):137-140. PubMed ID: 27392285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making.
    Di Pietro NC; Illes J
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 24006134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Next generation sequencing: considering the ethics.
    Davey S
    Int J Immunogenet; 2014 Dec; 41(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 25345691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
    Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine.
    Clarke AJ
    Br Med Bull; 2014 Sep; 111(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25122627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Next generation sequencing in psychiatric research: what study participants need to know about research findings.
    Mathieu G; Groisman IJ; Godard B
    Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2013 Oct; 16(9):2119-27. PubMed ID: 23725748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters.
    Rahimzadeh V; Avard D; Sénécal K; Knoppers BM; Sinnett D
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Mar; 23(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 24916647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of incidental findings: should they be viewed as benefits?
    Parker LS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):341-51, 213. PubMed ID: 18547203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
    Wolf SM; Paradise J; Caga-anan C
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):361-83, 214. PubMed ID: 18547206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.
    Simon C; Shinkunas LA; Brandt D; Williams JK
    J Med Ethics; 2012 Jul; 38(7):417-22. PubMed ID: 22361295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Institutional review board approaches to the incidental findings problem.
    Keane MA
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):352-5, 213. PubMed ID: 18547204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Focus group discussions on secondary variants and next-generation sequencing technologies.
    Christenhusz GM; Devriendt K; Van Esch H; Dierickx K
    Eur J Med Genet; 2015 Apr; 58(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 25662393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.
    Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
    BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 32000764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.
    Downing NR; Williams JK; Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M; Simon CM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jan; 90(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 23068909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
    Wolf SM; Lawrenz FP; Nelson CA; Kahn JP; Cho MK; Clayton EW; Fletcher JG; Georgieff MK; Hammerschmidt D; Hudson K; Illes J; Kapur V; Keane MA; Koenig BA; Leroy BS; McFarland EG; Paradise J; Parker LS; Terry SF; Van Ness B; Wilfond BS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):219-48, 211. PubMed ID: 18547191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disclosure issues in neuroscience research.
    Parker LS; Kienholz ML
    Account Res; 2008; 15(4):226-41. PubMed ID: 18972264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The risks and benefits of searching for incidental findings in MRI research scans.
    Royal JM; Peterson BS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):305-14, 212. PubMed ID: 18547199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.
    Yushak ML; Han G; Bouberhan S; Epstein L; DiGiovanna MP; Mougalian SS; Sanft TB; Abu-Khalaf MM; Chung GG; Stein SM; Goldberg SB; Pusztai L; Hofstatter EW
    Cancer; 2016 May; 122(10):1588-97. PubMed ID: 26970385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.