292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25604854)
1. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
Jelsig AM; Qvist N; Brusgaard K; Ousager LB
Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Oct; 23(10):1423-6. PubMed ID: 25604854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Considering Actionability at the Participant's Research Setting Level for Anticipatable Incidental Findings from Clinical Research.
Ortiz-Osorno AB; Ehler LA; Brooks J
J Law Med Ethics; 2015; 43(3):619-32. PubMed ID: 26479571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choices of incidental findings of individuals undergoing genome wide sequencing, a single center's experience.
Bishop CL; Strong KA; Dimmock DP
Clin Genet; 2017 Jan; 91(1):137-140. PubMed ID: 27392285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making.
Di Pietro NC; Illes J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 24006134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Next generation sequencing: considering the ethics.
Davey S
Int J Immunogenet; 2014 Dec; 41(6):457-62. PubMed ID: 25345691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Middleton A; Morley KI; Bragin E; Firth HV; Hurles ME; Wright CF; Parker M;
Eur J Hum Genet; 2016 Jan; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 25920556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine.
Clarke AJ
Br Med Bull; 2014 Sep; 111(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 25122627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Next generation sequencing in psychiatric research: what study participants need to know about research findings.
Mathieu G; Groisman IJ; Godard B
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol; 2013 Oct; 16(9):2119-27. PubMed ID: 23725748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To disclose, or not to disclose? Context matters.
Rahimzadeh V; Avard D; Sénécal K; Knoppers BM; Sinnett D
Eur J Hum Genet; 2015 Mar; 23(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 24916647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The future of incidental findings: should they be viewed as benefits?
Parker LS
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):341-51, 213. PubMed ID: 18547203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
Wolf SM; Paradise J; Caga-anan C
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):361-83, 214. PubMed ID: 18547206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.
Simon C; Shinkunas LA; Brandt D; Williams JK
J Med Ethics; 2012 Jul; 38(7):417-22. PubMed ID: 22361295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review board approaches to the incidental findings problem.
Keane MA
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):352-5, 213. PubMed ID: 18547204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study.
Saelaert M; Mertes H; Moerenhout T; De Baere E; Devisch I
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):9. PubMed ID: 32000764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Focus group discussions on secondary variants and next-generation sequencing technologies.
Christenhusz GM; Devriendt K; Van Esch H; Dierickx K
Eur J Med Genet; 2015 Apr; 58(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 25662393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.
Downing NR; Williams JK; Daack-Hirsch S; Driessnack M; Simon CM
Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Jan; 90(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 23068909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Wolf SM; Lawrenz FP; Nelson CA; Kahn JP; Cho MK; Clayton EW; Fletcher JG; Georgieff MK; Hammerschmidt D; Hudson K; Illes J; Kapur V; Keane MA; Koenig BA; Leroy BS; McFarland EG; Paradise J; Parker LS; Terry SF; Van Ness B; Wilfond BS
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):219-48, 211. PubMed ID: 18547191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Disclosure issues in neuroscience research.
Parker LS; Kienholz ML
Account Res; 2008; 15(4):226-41. PubMed ID: 18972264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The risks and benefits of searching for incidental findings in MRI research scans.
Royal JM; Peterson BS
J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):305-14, 212. PubMed ID: 18547199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient preferences regarding incidental genomic findings discovered during tumor profiling.
Yushak ML; Han G; Bouberhan S; Epstein L; DiGiovanna MP; Mougalian SS; Sanft TB; Abu-Khalaf MM; Chung GG; Stein SM; Goldberg SB; Pusztai L; Hofstatter EW
Cancer; 2016 May; 122(10):1588-97. PubMed ID: 26970385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
