152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25604907)
1. Comparison of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging and X-ray mammography in the measurement of ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparison with histopathology.
Pickles MD; Gibbs P; Hubbard A; Rahman A; Wieczorek J; Turnbull LW
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):603-10. PubMed ID: 25604907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Mammography in the Preoperative Detection and Measurement of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Retrospective Analysis.
Preibsch H; Beckmann J; Pawlowski J; Kloth C; Hahn M; Staebler A; Wietek BM; Nikolaou K; Wiesinger B
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):760-765. PubMed ID: 30149976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative prediction of the size of pure ductal carcinoma in situ using three imaging modalities as compared to histopathological size: does magnetic resonance imaging add value?
Daniel OK; Lim SM; Kim JH; Park HS; Park S; Kim SI
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jul; 164(2):437-444. PubMed ID: 28439735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative MRI of pure intraductal breast carcinoma--a valuable adjunct to mammography in assessing cancer extent.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Zanón G; Fernández PL
Breast; 2008 Apr; 17(2):186-94. PubMed ID: 17964786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Targeted Intraoperative Radiotherapy for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast.
Rivera R; Banks A; Casillas-Lopez A; Rashtian A; Lewinsky B; Sheth P; Hovannesian-Larsen L; Brousseau D; Iyengar G; Holmes DR
Breast J; 2016; 22(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 26534876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Value of pre-operative breast MRI for the size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Proulx F; Correa JA; Ferré R; Omeroglu A; Aldis A; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150543. PubMed ID: 26568438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Menell JH; Morris EA; Dershaw DD; Abramson AF; Brogi E; Liberman L
Breast J; 2005; 11(6):382-90. PubMed ID: 16297080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preoperative breast MRI in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Kropcho LC; Steen ST; Chung AP; Sim MS; Kirsch DL; Giuliano AE
Breast J; 2012; 18(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 22211816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ with mammography, breast specific gamma imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study.
Brem RF; Fishman M; Rapelyea JA
Acad Radiol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):945-50. PubMed ID: 17659240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Baek SH; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 28281788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Bieling HB; Wardelmann E; Leutner CC; Koenig R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
Lancet; 2007 Aug; 370(9586):485-92. PubMed ID: 17693177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. No impact of breast magnetic resonance imaging on 15-year outcomes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or early-stage invasive breast cancer managed with breast conservation therapy.
Vapiwala N; Hwang WT; Kushner CJ; Schnall MD; Freedman GM; Solin LJ
Cancer; 2017 Apr; 123(8):1324-1332. PubMed ID: 27984658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What is the sensitivity of mammography and dynamic MR imaging for DCIS if the whole-breast histopathology is used as a reference standard?
Sardanelli F; Bacigalupo L; Carbonaro L; Esseridou A; Giuseppetti GM; Panizza P; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 2008 Apr; 113(3):439-51. PubMed ID: 18414812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative detection of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breasts: a comparison with low-energy image and magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang L; Wang P; Shao H; Li J; Yang Q
Eur Radiol; 2024 May; 34(5):3342-3351. PubMed ID: 37853174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extension of ductal carcinoma in situ: histopathological association with MR imaging and mammography.
Shiraishi A; Kurosaki Y; Maehara T; Suzuki M; Kurosumi M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2003 Dec; 2(4):159-63. PubMed ID: 16222109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is there a role for MRI in the preoperative assessment of patients with DCIS?
Allen LR; Lago-Toro CE; Hughes JH; Careaga E; Brown AT; Chernick M; Barrio AV; Frazier TG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Sep; 17(9):2395-400. PubMed ID: 20217259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
