123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25605157)
1. Performance indices of needle biopsy procedures for the assessment of screen detected abnormalities in services accredited by BreastScreen Australia.
Farshid G; Sullivan T; Jones S; Roder D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10665-73. PubMed ID: 25605157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of fine-needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy in the assessment of highly suspicious mammographic microcalcifications: analysis of outcome for 182 lesions detected in the setting of a population-based breast cancer screening program.
Farshid G; Rush G
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):357-64. PubMed ID: 14681944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screen-detected breast lesions with malignant needle core biopsy diagnoses and no malignancy identified in subsequent surgical excision specimens (potential false-positive diagnosis).
Rakha EA; El-Sayed ME; Reed J; Lee AHS; Evans AJ; Ellis IO
Eur J Cancer; 2009 May; 45(7):1162-1167. PubMed ID: 19121932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vacuum assisted stereotactic guided mammotome biopsies in the management of screen detected microcalcifications: experience of a large breast screening centre.
Kumaroswamy V; Liston J; Shaaban AM
J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):766-9. PubMed ID: 18326021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of abdominal and pelvic lesions in children. A comparison between fine-needle aspiration and 1.2 mm-needle core biopsy.
Hugosson CO; Nyman RS; Cappelen-Smith JM; Akhtar M; Hugosson C
Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Jan; 29(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 9880613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screen-detected malignant breast lesions diagnosed following benign (B2) or normal (B1) needle core biopsy diagnoses.
Rakha EA; Lee AH; Reed J; Murphy A; El-Sayed M; Burrell H; Evans AJ; Ellis IO
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jul; 46(10):1835-40. PubMed ID: 20392631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biopsy needle technique and the accuracy of diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia for mammographic abnormalities.
Zhao L; Freimanis R; Bergman S; Shen P; Perrier ND; Lesko N; Pulaski T; Pulaski S; Carr JJ; Levine EA
Am Surg; 2003 Sep; 69(9):757-62; discussion 762. PubMed ID: 14509322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role and histological classification of needle core biopsy in comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology in the preoperative assessment of impalpable breast lesions.
Ibrahim AE; Bateman AC; Theaker JM; Low JL; Addis B; Tidbury P; Rubin C; Briley M; Royle GT
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 11215280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital stereotactic biopsies for nonpalpable breast lesion.
Mariotti C; Feliciotti F; Baldarelli M; Serri L; Santinelli A; Fabris G; Baccarini M; Maggi S; Angelini L; De Marco M; Lezoche E
Surg Endosc; 2003 Jun; 17(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 12632135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Radiological and Invasive Diagnostic Modalities in Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.
Onur GO; Tarcan E; Onur A; Can H; Atahan MK; Yigit SC; Cakalagaoglu F
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(10):4323-8. PubMed ID: 26028093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcome of papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed by standard core needle biopsy within a BreastScreen Australia service.
Armes JE; Galbraith C; Gray J; Taylor K
Pathology; 2017 Apr; 49(3):267-270. PubMed ID: 28238415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary indications for diagnostic open biopsy in women assessed for screen-detected breast lesions: A ten-year, single institution series of 814 consecutive cases.
Farshid G; Gill PG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 28062979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Yield and complications in ultrasound-guided biopsy of abdominal lesions. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and 1.2-mm needle core biopsy using an automated biopsy gun.
Nyman RS; Cappelen-Smith J; Brismar J; von Sinner W; Kagevi I
Acta Radiol; 1995 Sep; 36(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 7640092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of needle core biopsy with excision histology in screen-detected B3 lesions: the Merrion Breast Screening Unit experience.
Hayes BD; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1136-40. PubMed ID: 19946101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate?
Carder PJ; Liston JC
J Clin Pathol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 12560393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of 1183 screen-detected, category 3B, circumscribed masses by cytology and core biopsy with long-term follow up data.
Farshid G; Downey P; Gill P; Pieterse S
Br J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 98(7):1182-90. PubMed ID: 18382460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of non-mass calcifications: outcome and accuracy at long-term follow-up.
Han BK; Choe YH; Ko YH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yang JH
Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 14726638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
