128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2560542)
1. Grading and prognosis of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma by nuclear image analysis in tissue sections.
Kunze KD; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Meyer W; Theissig F
Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Nov; 185(5):689-93. PubMed ID: 2560542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of nucleolar organizer regions for the lymph node spread and prognosis of invasive ductal mammary carcinoma.
Bockmühl U; Theissig F; Dimmer V; Kunze KD
Pathol Res Pract; 1991 May; 187(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 1652128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Morphological possibilities for objectification of the prognosis for invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast].
Theissig F; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Kunze KD; Meyer W
Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 1718409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of nuclear image cytometry, histopathological grading and DNA cytometry to make breast cancer prognosis more objective.
Theissig F; Dimmer V; Haroske G; Kunze KD; Meyer W
Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Nov; 3(6):351-60. PubMed ID: 1751402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative aspects in defining prognostic factors of breast cancer.
Komitowski D; Kett P; Janson C; Jarasch ED
Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Nov; 185(5):621-4. PubMed ID: 2560540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nuclear morphometry and DNA flow cytometry as prognostic factors in female breast cancer.
Aaltomaa S; Lipponen P; Papinaho S; Klemi P; Kosma VM; Marin S; Eskelinen M; Alhava E; Syrjänen K
Eur J Surg; 1992 Mar; 158(3):135-41. PubMed ID: 1356452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic significance of DNA image cytometry in Libyan breast cancer.
Ermiah E; Abdalla F; Buhmeida A; Alshrad M; Salem N; Pyrhönen S; Collan Y
Oncology; 2012; 83(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 22906963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cell nucleus analyses on the heterogenicity, proliferation and metastasis of malignant tumors].
Kunze KD; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Meyer W; Theissig F
Acta Histochem Suppl; 1990; 39():147-54. PubMed ID: 1964231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective nuclear grading for node-negative breast cancer patients: comparison of quasi-3D and 2D image-analysis based on light microscopic images.
Albert R; Müller JG; Kristen P; Harms H
Lab Invest; 1998 Mar; 78(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 9520938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Angiogenesis as determined by computerised image analysis and the risk of early relapse in women with invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
Olewniczak S; Chosia M; Kołodziej B; Kwas A; Kram A; Domagała W
Pol J Pathol; 2003; 54(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12817881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of morphological parameters for infiltrating ductal breast cancer prognosis.
Mariuzzi GM; Mambelli V; Criante P; Sisti S
Pathol Res Pract; 1989 Nov; 185(5):698-700. PubMed ID: 2560543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 expression is a predictor of poor prognosis in node-positive breast cancers: a long-term follow-up study.
Yoshioka T; Umekita Y; Ohi Y; Souda M; Sagara Y; Sagara Y; Sagara Y; Rai Y; Tanimoto A
Histopathology; 2011 Mar; 58(4):608-16. PubMed ID: 21371077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Grading, staging, DNA content and prognosis of invasive ductal breast cancer].
Theissig F; Kunze KD; Haroske G; Meyer W; Dimmer V
Zentralbl Chir; 1990; 115(7):433-9. PubMed ID: 2164288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative nuclear morphometry by image analysis for prediction of recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Hoque A; Lippman SM; Boiko IV; Atkinson EN; Sneige N; Sahin A; Weber DM; Risin S; Lagios MD; Schwarting R; Colburn WJ; Dhingra K; Follen M; Kelloff GJ; Boone CW; Hittelman WN
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Mar; 10(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 11303595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An image analysis study on nuclear morphology in metastasized and non-metastasized squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue.
Hannen EJ; van der Laak JA; Manni JJ; Pahlplatz MM; Freihofer HP; Slootweg PJ; Koole R; de Wilde PC
J Pathol; 1998 Jun; 185(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 9713344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance (relapse, non-relapse) of nuclear shape parameters in lymph node negative breast cancer.
Umbricht C; Oberholzer M; Gschwind R; Christen H; Torhorst J
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Feb; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 2562217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic significance of image cytometry DNA parameters in tissue sections from breast and gastric cancers.
Haroske G; Kunze KD; Theissig F
Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Jan; 3(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 1848088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Frequency distribution, microscopic image analysis and grading of mammary carcinoma].
Guski H; Winzer KJ; Seidenfaden U; Hufnagl P; Wolf G
Zentralbl Pathol; 1991; 137(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 1718410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of nuclear grading assessed by image cytometry for node negative breast cancer patients.
Kimijima I; Watanabe T; Abe R
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(6C):3949-53. PubMed ID: 9042318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative morphology of primary and metastatic tumors: comparative studies on tissue sections.
Kunze KD; Haroske G; Dimmer V; Meyer W; Theissig F
Anal Cell Pathol; 1989 Jun; 1(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 2487042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]