These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

950 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25605625)

  • 21. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.
    Unterscheider J; McMenamin M; Cullinane F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 21470764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prepartum and intrapartum caesarean section rates at Mater Mothers' Hospital Brisbane 1997-2005.
    Janssens S; Wallace KL; Chang AM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Dec; 48(6):564-9. PubMed ID: 19133044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Maternal age and emergency operative deliveries at term: a population-based registry study among low-risk primiparous women.
    Herstad L; Klungsøyr K; Skjaerven R; Tanbo T; Forsén L; Åbyholm T; Vangen S
    BJOG; 2015 Nov; 122(12):1642-51. PubMed ID: 25100277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
    Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
    Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Induction of labour: indications and obstetric outcomes in a tertiary referral hospital.
    Buist R
    N Z Med J; 1999 Jul; 112(1091):251-3. PubMed ID: 10448982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. National Variation in Caesarean Section Rates: A Cross Sectional Study in Ireland.
    Sinnott SJ; Brick A; Layte R; Cunningham N; Turner MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156172. PubMed ID: 27280848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
    Jonsson M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Outcome of labour in nullipara at term with unengaged vertex.
    Chaudhary S; Farrukh R; Dar A; Humayun S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2009; 21(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 20929031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cesarean delivery in Finland: maternal complications and obstetric risk factors.
    Pallasmaa N; Ekblad U; Aitokallio-Tallberg A; Uotila J; Raudaskoski T; Ulander VM; Hurme S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):896-902. PubMed ID: 20583935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Trends in obstetric interventions in the Dutch obstetrical care system in the period 1993-2002.
    Kwee A; Elferink-Stinkens PM; Reuwer PJ; Bruinse HW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 16884843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increased risk of cesarean delivery with advancing maternal age: indications and associated factors in nulliparous women.
    Ecker JL; Chen KT; Cohen AP; Riley LE; Lieberman ES
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 11641671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inter-institutional Variation in Use of Caesarean Delivery for Labour Dystocia.
    Riddell CA; Hutcheon JA; Strumpf EC; Abenhaim HA; Kaufman JS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Nov; 39(11):988-995. PubMed ID: 28916125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The association between increasing maternal age at first birth and decreased rates of spontaneous vaginal birth in South Australia from 1991 to 2009.
    Baghurst P; Robson S; Antoniou G; Scheil W; Bryce R
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Jun; 54(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 24506445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Care seeking during the latent phase of labour--frequencies and birth outcomes in two delivery wards in Sweden.
    Lundgren I; Andrén K; Nissen E; Berg M
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2013 Dec; 4(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 24216043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intervention thresholds and cesarean section rates: A time-trends analysis.
    Rose A; Raja EA; Bhattacharya S; Black M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Oct; 97(10):1257-1266. PubMed ID: 29900544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients.
    Craven S; Byrne F; Mahony R; Walsh JM
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Dec; 20(1):746. PubMed ID: 33261564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.
    Kayani SI; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of change in a labour management protocol on caesarean section rate in nulliparous women.
    Kuppens SMI; Brugman A; Hasaart THM; Hutton EK; Pop VJM
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Jun; 35(6):508-514. PubMed ID: 23870774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Term spontaneous trial of labor in nulliparous women of short stature: A hospitals-based cohort study.
    Boujenah J; Carbillon L; Banh P; Sibony O; Korb D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():181-186. PubMed ID: 32007340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.