These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25605749)

  • 1. Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review study.
    Dijkstra AM; Schuijff M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):588-602. PubMed ID: 25605749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
    Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.
    Sturgis P; Cooper H; Fife-Schaw C
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Apr; 24(1):31-56. PubMed ID: 16552916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceived efficacy and attitudes towards genetic science and science governance.
    Knight T; Barnett J
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jul; 19(4):386-402. PubMed ID: 20977179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mind the gap: Comparing expert and public opinions on managing overabundant koalas.
    Drijfhout M; Kendal D; Green P
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114621. PubMed ID: 35134692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An overview of the role of society and risk in xenotransplantation.
    Sobbrio P; Jorqui M
    Xenotransplantation; 2014; 21(6):523-32. PubMed ID: 25040770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring risk/benefit perceptions of emerging technologies and their potential impact on communication of public opinion toward science.
    Binder AR; Cacciatore MA; Scheufele DA; Shaw BR; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Oct; 21(7):830-47. PubMed ID: 23832561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public attitudes and perceptions about health-related research.
    Woolley M; Propst SM
    JAMA; 2005 Sep; 294(11):1380-4. PubMed ID: 16174697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The attitudes of religious, environmental, and science policy leaders toward biotechnology.
    Miller JD
    Recomb DNA Tech Bull; 1985 Dec; 8(4):141-64. PubMed ID: 4095277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visions and versions of governing biomedicine: narratives on power structures, decision-making and public participation in the field of biomedical technology in the Austrian context.
    Felt U; Fochler M; Mager A; Winkler P
    Soc Stud Sci; 2008 Apr; 38(2):233-57. PubMed ID: 18831132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It takes a giraffe to see the big picture - citizens' view on decision makers in health care rationing.
    Broqvist M; Garpenby P
    Soc Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 128():301-8. PubMed ID: 25638017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The public's opinions of physicians: do perceived choice and exercised choice matter?
    Tai-Seale M; Pescosolido B
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Sep; 9(9):631-8. PubMed ID: 14527108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.
    Barnett J; Cooper H; Senior V
    Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):921-33. PubMed ID: 17958501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What choices should we be able to make about designer babies? A Citizens' Jury of young people in South Wales.
    Iredale R; Longley M; Thomas C; Shaw A
    Health Expect; 2006 Sep; 9(3):207-17. PubMed ID: 16911135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The public's attitude and perception concerning witnessed cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Mazer MA; Cox LA; Capon JA
    Crit Care Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):2925-8. PubMed ID: 17075365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative analysis of attitudes toward genome-edited food among Japanese public and scientific community.
    Shineha R; Takeda KF; Yamaguchi Y; Koizumi N
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0300107. PubMed ID: 38625915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Complexity and conundrums. Citizens' evaluations of potentially contentious novel food technologies using a deliberative discourse approach.
    Greehy GM; McCarthy MB; Henchion MM; Dillon EJ; McCarthy SN
    Appetite; 2013 Nov; 70():37-46. PubMed ID: 23811347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Progress bias versus status quo bias in the ethics of emerging science and technology.
    Hofmann B
    Bioethics; 2020 Mar; 34(3):252-263. PubMed ID: 31617222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales.
    Calnan M; Montaner D; Horne R
    Soc Sci Med; 2005 May; 60(9):1937-48. PubMed ID: 15743645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Heterogeneous attitudinal profiles towards gene editing: Evidence from latent class analysis.
    Halstead IN; Boehnke JR; Lewis GJ
    Public Underst Sci; 2023 Feb; 32(2):159-174. PubMed ID: 36003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.