BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25607682)

  • 1. Can we model the implementation of water sensitive urban design in evolving cities?
    Bach PM; Mccarthy DT; Deletic A
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 25607682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A spatial planning-support system for generating decentralised urban stormwater management schemes.
    Bach PM; Kuller M; McCarthy DT; Deletic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 726():138282. PubMed ID: 32481224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) Spatial Prioritisation through Global Sensitivity Analysis for Effective Urban Pluvial Flood Mitigation.
    Wu W; Jamali B; Zhang K; Marshall L; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2023 May; 235():119888. PubMed ID: 36966681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A planning algorithm for quantifying decentralised water management opportunities in urban environments.
    Bach PM; McCarthy DT; Urich C; Sitzenfrei R; Kleidorfer M; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(8):1857-65. PubMed ID: 24185071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modelling transitions in urban water systems.
    Rauch W; Urich C; Bach PM; Rogers BC; de Haan FJ; Brown RR; Mair M; McCarthy DT; Kleidorfer M; Sitzenfrei R; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2017 Dec; 126():501-514. PubMed ID: 29031187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can water sensitive urban design systems help to preserve natural channel-forming flow regimes in an urbanised catchment?
    Wella-Hewage CS; Alankarage Hewa G; Pezzaniti D
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 26744937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A planning-support tool for spatial suitability assessment of green urban stormwater infrastructure.
    Kuller M; Bach PM; Roberts S; Browne D; Deletic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Oct; 686():856-868. PubMed ID: 31412525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A streamlined sustainability assessment tool for improved decision making in the urban water industry.
    Schulz M; Short MD; Peters GM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jan; 8(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 21751340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sustainable urban development in Brisbane City--the Holy Grail?
    Rahman K; Weber T
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(7-8):73-9. PubMed ID: 12793664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a simplified urban water balance model (WABILA).
    Henrichs M; Langner J; Uhl M
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(8):1785-95. PubMed ID: 27120631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining water sensitive urban design project benefits using a multi-criteria assessment tool.
    Urrutiaguer M; Lloyd S; Lamshed S
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2333-41. PubMed ID: 20418631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A socio-technical model to explore urban water systems scenarios.
    de Haan FJ; Ferguson BC; Deletic A; Brown RR
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(3):714-21. PubMed ID: 23925202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Water Sensitive Urban Design retrofits in Copenhagen - 40% to the sewer, 60% to the city.
    Fryd O; Backhaus A; Birch H; Fratini CF; Ingvertsen ST; Jeppesen J; Panduro TE; Roldin M; Jensen MB
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(9):1945-52. PubMed ID: 23656936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working towards sustainable urban water management: the vulnerability blind spot.
    Werbeloff L; Brown R
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(12):2362-9. PubMed ID: 22170828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling the urban water cycle as an integrated part of the city: a review.
    Urich C; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 70(11):1857-72. PubMed ID: 25500475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transitioning to a waterways city: municipal context, capacity and commitment.
    Morison PJ; Brown RR; Cocklin C
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(1):162-71. PubMed ID: 20595767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Editorial: Novatech 2004--synthesis of 3 years of scientific and technical advances in urban water management.
    Chocat B; Desbordes M; Brelot E
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(2):vii-xiv. PubMed ID: 15790221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A stochastic optimization approach for integrated urban water resource planning.
    Huang Y; Chen J; Zeng S; Sun F; Dong X
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(7):1634-41. PubMed ID: 23552255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Valuing the benefits of creek rehabilitation: building a business case for public investments in urban green infrastructure.
    Mekala GD; Jones RN; MacDonald DH
    Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1354-65. PubMed ID: 25832343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determinants of single family residential water use across scales in four western US cities.
    Chang H; Bonnette MR; Stoker P; Crow-Miller B; Wentz E
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Oct; 596-597():451-464. PubMed ID: 28456051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.