207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25608538)
1. [Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk: a meta-analysis].
Park SH; Park YS
J Korean Acad Nurs; 2014 Dec; 44(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 25608538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk in hospitalized patients.
Park SH; Choi YK; Kang CB
J Tissue Viability; 2015 Aug; 24(3):102-13. PubMed ID: 26050532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Park SH; Lee HS
Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
He W; Liu P; Chen HL
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients.
Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive efficacy of the Braden Q Scale for pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment in the PICU: a meta-analysis.
Chun X; Lin Y; Ma J; He J; Ye L; Yang H
Pediatr Res; 2019 Oct; 86(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 31216569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
de Souza DM; Santos VL; Iri HK; Sadasue Oguri MY
Geriatr Nurs; 2010; 31(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20381710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive validity of 4 risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcer development in a hospital setting.
Källman U; Lindgren M
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2014 Feb; 27(2):70-6. PubMed ID: 24440864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis.
Liao Y; Gao G; Mo L
Int J Nurs Sci; 2018 Oct; 5(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 31406858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.
Bergstrom N; Demuth PJ; Braden BJ
Nurs Clin North Am; 1987 Jun; 22(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 3554150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.
Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study.
Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive and concurrent validity of the Braden scale in long-term care: a meta-analysis.
Wilchesky M; Lungu O
Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 25682792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pilot study compares scores of the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (MDS 2.0) Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale with the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment for patients in complex continuing care.
Carreau L; Niezgoda H; Trainor A; Parent M; Woodbury MG
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 28(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25502973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
