155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25608679)
1. A prospective investigation into the clinical impact of 4D-PET/CT in the characterisation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Callahan J; Kron T; Schneider ME; Hicks RJ
Cancer Imaging; 2014 Jun; 14(1):24. PubMed ID: 25608679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Respiratory-gated imaging in metabolic evaluation of small solitary pulmonary nodules: 18F-FDG PET/CT and correlation with histology.
Farid K; Poullias X; Alifano M; Regnard JF; Servois V; Caillat-Vigneron N; Petras S
Nucl Med Commun; 2015 Jul; 36(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 25793929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Fletcher JW; Kymes SM; Gould M; Alazraki N; Coleman RE; Lowe VJ; Marn C; Segall G; Thet LA; Lee K;
J Nucl Med; 2008 Feb; 49(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18199626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT.
Christensen JA; Nathan MA; Mullan BP; Hartman TE; Swensen SJ; Lowe VJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1361-7. PubMed ID: 17056930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Solitary pulmonary nodule evaluation in regions endemic for infectious diseases: Do regional variations impact the effectiveness of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Purandare NC; Pramesh CS; Agarwal JP; Agrawal A; Shah S; Prabhash K; Karimundackal G; Jiwnani S; Tandon S; Rangarajan V
Indian J Cancer; 2017; 54(1):271-275. PubMed ID: 29199704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with quantitative first-pass 320-detector row perfusion CT versus FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Koyama H; Matsumoto K; Onishi Y; Takenaka D; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Konishi M; Maniwa Y; Nishimura Y; Ito T; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):599-609. PubMed ID: 21273522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. (18)F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications.
García Vicente AM; Soriano Castrejón AM; Talavera Rubio MP; León Martín AA; Palomar Muñoz AM; Pilkington Woll JP; Poblete García VM
Ann Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 24(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 20177834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solitary pulmonary nodules: morphological and metabolic characterisation by FDG-PET-MDCT.
Orlacchio A; Schillaci O; Antonelli L; D'Urso S; Sergiacomi G; Nicolì P; Simonetti G
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 17361379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Li W; Pang H; Liu Q; Zhou J
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):2032-7. PubMed ID: 26094866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography for evaluation of indeterminate lung nodules: assigning a probability of malignancy may be preferable to binary readings.
Kim SC; Machac J; Krynyckyi BR; Knesaurek K; Krellenstein D; Schultz B; Gribetz A; DePalo L; Teirstein A; Kim CK
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 22(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 18498030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of quantitatively analyzed dynamic area-detector CT using various mathematic methods with FDG PET/CT in management of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Ohno Y; Nishio M; Koyama H; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jun; 200(6):W593-602. PubMed ID: 23701089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The maximum standardized uptake values on integrated FDG-PET/CT is useful in differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules.
Bryant AS; Cerfolio RJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 82(3):1016-20. PubMed ID: 16928527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Solitary pulmonary nodules: Comparison of dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced perfusion area-detector CT, dynamic first-pass contrast-enhanced MR imaging, and FDG PET/CT.
Ohno Y; Nishio M; Koyama H; Seki S; Tsubakimoto M; Fujisawa Y; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Sugimura K
Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):563-75. PubMed ID: 25203128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET.
Hickeson M; Yun M; Matthies A; Zhuang H; Adam LE; Lacorte L; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Dec; 29(12):1639-47. PubMed ID: 12458399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of PET/CT in differentiation of malignant and benign non-solid solitary pulmonary nodules.
Tsushima Y; Tateishi U; Uno H; Takeuchi M; Terauchi T; Goya T; Kim EE
Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 22(7):571-7. PubMed ID: 18756359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indeterminate lung nodules in cancer patients: pretest probability of malignancy and the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Evangelista L; Panunzio A; Polverosi R; Pomerri F; Rubello D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):507-14. PubMed ID: 24555586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Limitations of dual time point PET in the assessment of lung nodules with low FDG avidity.
Cloran FJ; Banks KP; Song WS; Kim Y; Bradley YC
Lung Cancer; 2010 Apr; 68(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 19559496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical significance of small pulmonary nodules with little or no 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT images of patients with nonthoracic malignancies.
O JH; Yoo IeR; Kim SH; Sohn HS; Chung SK
J Nucl Med; 2007 Jan; 48(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17204694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary lesions - own experience.
Opoka L; Kunikowska J; Podgajny Z; Szołkowska M; Błasińska-Przerwa K; Burakowska B; Oniszh K; Rudziński P; Bestry I; Roszkowski-Śliż K
Pneumonol Alergol Pol; 2014; 82(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 24793147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
