These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25608874)

  • 1. Tracking down the sources of experimental contamination in microbiome studies.
    Weiss S; Amir A; Hyde ER; Metcalf JL; Song SJ; Knight R
    Genome Biol; 2014 Dec; 15(12):564. PubMed ID: 25608874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification and removal of contaminating microbial DNA from PCR reagents: impact on low-biomass microbiome analyses.
    Stinson LF; Keelan JA; Payne MS
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30383890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sterile paper points as a bacterial DNA-contamination source in microbiome profiles of clinical samples.
    van der Horst J; Buijs MJ; Laine ML; Wismeijer D; Loos BG; Crielaard W; Zaura E
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1297-301. PubMed ID: 24135296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass.
    Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E
    Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Studies: Issues and Recommendations.
    Eisenhofer R; Minich JJ; Marotz C; Cooper A; Knight R; Weyrich LS
    Trends Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 27(2):105-117. PubMed ID: 30497919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses.
    Salter SJ; Cox MJ; Turek EM; Calus ST; Cookson WO; Moffatt MF; Turner P; Parkhill J; Loman NJ; Walker AW
    BMC Biol; 2014 Nov; 12():87. PubMed ID: 25387460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbiology. Contamination plagues some microbiome studies.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2014 Nov; 346(6211):801. PubMed ID: 25395516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recognizing the reagent microbiome.
    de Goffau MC; Lager S; Salter SJ; Wagner J; Kronbichler A; Charnock-Jones DS; Peacock SJ; Smith GCS; Parkhill J
    Nat Microbiol; 2018 Aug; 3(8):851-853. PubMed ID: 30046175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved multiple displacement amplification (iMDA) and ultraclean reagents.
    Motley ST; Picuri JM; Crowder CD; Minich JJ; Hofstadler SA; Eshoo MW
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):443. PubMed ID: 24906487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High throughput sequencing methods and analysis for microbiome research.
    Di Bella JM; Bao Y; Gloor GB; Burton JP; Reid G
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):401-14. PubMed ID: 24029734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Ancient DNA in Microbial Ecology.
    Gorgé O; Bennett EA; Massilani D; Daligault J; Pruvost M; Geigl EM; Grange T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1399():289-315. PubMed ID: 26791510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plasmid DNA contaminant in molecular reagents.
    Wally N; Schneider M; Thannesberger J; Kastner MT; Bakonyi T; Indik S; Rattei T; Bedarf J; Hildebrand F; Law J; Jovel J; Steininger C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1652. PubMed ID: 30733546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A metagenomic DNA sequencing assay that is robust against environmental DNA contamination.
    Mzava O; Cheng AP; Chang A; Smalling S; Djomnang LK; Lenz JS; Longman R; Steadman A; Gómez-Escobar LG; Schenck EJ; Salvatore M; Satlin MJ; Suthanthiran M; Lee JR; Mason CE; Dadhania D; De Vlaminck I
    Nat Commun; 2022 Jul; 13(1):4197. PubMed ID: 35864089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using strain-resolved analysis to identify contamination in metagenomics data.
    Lou YC; Hoff J; Olm MR; West-Roberts J; Diamond S; Firek BA; Morowitz MJ; Banfield JF
    Microbiome; 2023 Mar; 11(1):36. PubMed ID: 36864482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inline index helped in cleaning up data contamination generated during library preparation and the subsequent steps.
    Wang Y; Yuan H; Huang J; Li C
    Mol Biol Rep; 2022 Jan; 49(1):385-392. PubMed ID: 34716505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inherent bacterial DNA contamination of extraction and sequencing reagents may affect interpretation of microbiota in low bacterial biomass samples.
    Glassing A; Dowd SE; Galandiuk S; Davis B; Chiodini RJ
    Gut Pathog; 2016; 8():24. PubMed ID: 27239228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis.
    Weyrich LS; Farrer AG; Eisenhofer R; Arriola LA; Young J; Selway CA; Handsley-Davis M; Adler CJ; Breen J; Cooper A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):982-996. PubMed ID: 30887686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced microbial diversity in the saliva microbiome induced by short-term probiotic intake revealed by 16S rRNA sequencing on the IonTorrent PGM platform.
    Dassi E; Ballarini A; Covello G; ; Quattrone A; Jousson O; De Sanctis V; Bertorelli R; Denti MA; Segata N
    J Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 190():30-9. PubMed ID: 24670254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications.
    Champlot S; Berthelot C; Pruvost M; Bennett EA; Grange T; Geigl EM
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20927390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.