These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25608874)
1. Tracking down the sources of experimental contamination in microbiome studies. Weiss S; Amir A; Hyde ER; Metcalf JL; Song SJ; Knight R Genome Biol; 2014 Dec; 15(12):564. PubMed ID: 25608874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification and removal of contaminating microbial DNA from PCR reagents: impact on low-biomass microbiome analyses. Stinson LF; Keelan JA; Payne MS Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 30383890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces. Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sterile paper points as a bacterial DNA-contamination source in microbiome profiles of clinical samples. van der Horst J; Buijs MJ; Laine ML; Wismeijer D; Loos BG; Crielaard W; Zaura E J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1297-301. PubMed ID: 24135296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved yield and accuracy for DNA extraction in microbiome studies with variation in microbial biomass. Davis A; Kohler C; Alsallaq R; Hayden R; Maron G; Margolis E Biotechniques; 2019 Jun; 66(6):285-289. PubMed ID: 31124702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contamination in Low Microbial Biomass Microbiome Studies: Issues and Recommendations. Eisenhofer R; Minich JJ; Marotz C; Cooper A; Knight R; Weyrich LS Trends Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 27(2):105-117. PubMed ID: 30497919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inline index helped in cleaning up data contamination generated during library preparation and the subsequent steps. Wang Y; Yuan H; Huang J; Li C Mol Biol Rep; 2022 Jan; 49(1):385-392. PubMed ID: 34716505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inherent bacterial DNA contamination of extraction and sequencing reagents may affect interpretation of microbiota in low bacterial biomass samples. Glassing A; Dowd SE; Galandiuk S; Davis B; Chiodini RJ Gut Pathog; 2016; 8():24. PubMed ID: 27239228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis. Weyrich LS; Farrer AG; Eisenhofer R; Arriola LA; Young J; Selway CA; Handsley-Davis M; Adler CJ; Breen J; Cooper A Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):982-996. PubMed ID: 30887686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced microbial diversity in the saliva microbiome induced by short-term probiotic intake revealed by 16S rRNA sequencing on the IonTorrent PGM platform. Dassi E; Ballarini A; Covello G; ; Quattrone A; Jousson O; De Sanctis V; Bertorelli R; Denti MA; Segata N J Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 190():30-9. PubMed ID: 24670254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications. Champlot S; Berthelot C; Pruvost M; Bennett EA; Grange T; Geigl EM PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20927390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]