144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25610056)
1. Comparison of 16-slice computed tomography with conventional angiography to evaluate coronary artery stent patency.
Durur-Subasi I; Kantarci M; Durur-Karakaya A; Okur A
Eurasian J Med; 2009 Apr; 41(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 25610056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography.
Kitagawa T; Fujii T; Tomohiro Y; Maeda K; Kobayashi M; Kunita E; Sekiguchi Y
Int J Cardiol; 2006 May; 109(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 16019087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector CT angiography for detection of in-stent restenosis of vertebral artery ostium stents: comparison with conventional angiography.
Lee YJ; Lim YS; Lim HW; Yoo WJ; Choi BG; Kim BS
Acta Radiol; 2014 Oct; 55(8):1000-7. PubMed ID: 24107930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of coronary artery stent patency by using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and conventional coronary angiography: a comparison with intravascular ultrasonography.
Hang CL; Lee YW; Guo GB; Youssef AA; Yip HK; Liu CF; Chua S; Chang HW; Cheng YF; Chen SM
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jun; 166(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 22056475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Rixe J; Achenbach S; Ropers D; Baum U; Kuettner A; Ropers U; Bautz W; Daniel WG; Anders K
Eur Heart J; 2006 Nov; 27(21):2567-72. PubMed ID: 17035252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography.
Sheth T; Dodd JD; Hoffmann U; Abbara S; Finn A; Gold HK; Brady TJ; Cury RC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jun; 69(7):933-8. PubMed ID: 17421013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does 16-slice multidetector computed tomography improve stent patency and in-stent restenosis evaluation?
Ligabue G; Fiocchi F; Ferraresi S; Rossi R; Modena MG; Ratti C; Torricelli P; Romagnoli R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Jun; 8(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 17502760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multidetector-row CT for detection of in-stent restenosis vs detection of stenosis in nonstented coronary arteries.
Kefer JM; Coche E; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jan; 17(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 16733682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of peripheral artery stent with 64-slice multi-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Li XM; Li YH; Tian JM; Xiao Y; Lu JP; Jing ZP; Sheng J; Edwin A; Wu FH
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 19376662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of coronary stents by 64-slice computed tomography: in-stent lumen visibility and patency.
Kong LY; Jin ZY; Zhang SY; Zhang ZH; Wang YN; Song L; Zhang XN; Zhang YQ
Chin Med Sci J; 2009 Sep; 24(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 19848316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: value of subtraction coronary computed tomography angiography.
Amanuma M; Kondo T; Sano T; Takayanagi T; Matsutani H; Sekine T; Arai T; Morita H; Ishizaka K; Arakita K; Iwasa A; Takase S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 32(4):661-70. PubMed ID: 26662268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-invasive computed tomography angiography in the assessment of coronary stent patency: an Australian experience.
Soon KH; Cox N; Chaitowitz I; Selvanayagam JB; Farouque O; MacGregor L; Bell KW; Lim YL
Intern Med J; 2007 Jun; 37(6):360-4. PubMed ID: 17535378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis.
Andreini D; Pontone G; Bartorelli AL; Trabattoni D; Mushtaq S; Bertella E; Annoni A; Formenti A; Cortinovis S; Montorsi P; Veglia F; Ballerini G; Pepi M
Am J Cardiol; 2009 May; 103(10):1349-58. PubMed ID: 19427427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Assessment of coronary stent lumen visibility and patency by 64-slice spiral CT angiography].
Kong LY; Jin ZY; Wang YN; Song L; Zhang ZH; Zhang LR; Zhang SY; Lin SB; Wang Y; Zhao WM
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2006 Feb; 28(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 16548184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sixteen-slice multidetector computed tomography for graft patency evaluation after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Uva MS; Matias F; Mesquita A; Costa R; Baú J; Pedro A; Magalhães MP
J Card Surg; 2008; 23(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18290881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impairment factors for evaluating the patency of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents in coronary arteries by 64-slice computed tomography versus conventional coronary angiography.
Nakamura K; Funabashi N; Uehara M; Suzuki K; Terao M; Okubo K; Mita Y; Maeda F; Komuro I
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 130(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 18180050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary stent assessment on multidetector computed tomography: source and predictors of image distortion.
Halon DA; Gaspar T; Adawi S; Peled N; Lewis BS
Int J Cardiol; 2008 Aug; 128(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17707094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of in-stent restenosis using 64-MDCT: analysis of the CORE-64 Multicenter International Trial.
Wykrzykowska JJ; Arbab-Zadeh A; Godoy G; Miller JM; Lin S; Vavere A; Paul N; Niinuma H; Hoe J; Brinker J; Khosa F; Sarwar S; Lima J; Clouse ME
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 20028909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of in-stent restenosis in proximal coronary arteries with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
Chabbert V; Carrie D; Bennaceur M; Maupas E; Lauwers V; Mhem M; Lhermusier T; Elbaz M; Joffre F; Rousseau H; Puel J
Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1452-63. PubMed ID: 17115159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography.
Gaspar T; Halon DA; Lewis BS; Adawi S; Schliamser JE; Rubinshtein R; Flugelman MY; Peled N
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 46(8):1573-9. PubMed ID: 16226187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
