These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25611442)

  • 1. Development and examination of a rubric for evaluating point-of-care medical applications for mobile devices.
    Butcher R; MacKinnon M; Gadd K; LeBlanc-Duchin D
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2015; 34(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 25611442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mobile medical apps for patient education: a graded review of available dermatology apps.
    Masud A; Shafi S; Rao BK
    Cutis; 2018 Feb; 101(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 29554157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Tool for Rating the Value of Health Education Mobile Apps to Enhance Student Learning (MARuL): Development and Usability Study.
    Gladman T; Tylee G; Gallagher S; Mair J; Rennie SC; Grainger R
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e18015. PubMed ID: 32735228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a Framework for Evaluating Mobile Mental Health Apps.
    Chan S; Torous J; Hinton L; Yellowlees P
    Telemed J E Health; 2015 Dec; 21(12):1038-41. PubMed ID: 26171663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review and analysis of existing mobile phone applications for health care-associated infection prevention.
    Schnall R; Iribarren SJ
    Am J Infect Control; 2015 Jun; 43(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 25748924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring the Usability of Mobile Apps Supporting Radiologists' Training in Diagnostic Decision Making.
    Kim MS; Aro MR; Lage KJ; Ingalls KL; Sindhwani V; Markey MK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 26482814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to Evaluate Mobile Health Applications: A Scoping Review.
    Fiore P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 234():109-114. PubMed ID: 28186025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smartphone breast applications - what's the evidence?
    Mobasheri MH; Johnston M; King D; Leff D; Thiruchelvam P; Darzi A
    Breast; 2014 Oct; 23(5):683-9. PubMed ID: 25153432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AppFactLib - A Concept for Providing Transparent Information about Health Apps and Medical Apps.
    Jungnicke T; von Jan U; Albrecht UV
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 213():201-4. PubMed ID: 26152992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assessment of a sample of mobile app-based health behavior change interventions using a tool based on the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence behavior change guidance.
    McMillan B; Hickey E; Patel MG; Mitchell C
    Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Mar; 99(3):429-435. PubMed ID: 26607787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technology Evaluation and Assessment Criteria for Health Apps (TEACH-Apps): Pilot Study.
    Camacho E; Hoffman L; Lagan S; Rodriguez-Villa E; Rauseo-Ricupero N; Wisniewski H; Henson P; Torous J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18346. PubMed ID: 32535548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. mHealth Quality: A Process to Seal the Qualified Mobile Health Apps.
    Yasini M; Beranger J; Desmarais P; Perez L; Marchand G
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 228():205-9. PubMed ID: 27577372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mobile Apps for Educational Purposes.
    Pilcher J
    J Nurses Prof Dev; 2016; 32(6):306-308. PubMed ID: 27846081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Qualitative evaluation of mobile cancer apps with particular attention to the target group, content, and advertising.
    Böhme C; von Osthoff MB; Frey K; Hübner J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 144(1):173-181. PubMed ID: 29052039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High quantity but limited quality in healthcare applications intended for HIV-infected patients.
    Robustillo Cortés Mde L; Cantudo Cuenca MR; Morillo Verdugo R; Calvo Cidoncha E
    Telemed J E Health; 2014 Aug; 20(8):729-35. PubMed ID: 24849001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a Rating Tool for Mobile Cancer Apps: Information Analysis and Formal and Content-Related Evaluation of Selected Cancer Apps.
    Böhme C; von Osthoff MB; Frey K; Hübner J
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Feb; 34(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 28819928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinicians' perceptions of usefulness of the PubMed4Hh mobile device application for clinical decision making at the point of care: a pilot study.
    Gartrell K; Brennan CW; Wallen GR; Liu F; Smith KG; Fontelo P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 May; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29739392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. There's an App for That? Highlighting the Difficulty in Finding Clinically Relevant Smartphone Applications.
    Wiechmann W; Kwan D; Bokarius A; Toohey SL
    West J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 17(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 26973750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In search of a few good apps.
    Powell AC; Landman AB; Bates DW
    JAMA; 2014 May; 311(18):1851-2. PubMed ID: 24664278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mobile Apps Providing Tailored Nursing Interventions for Patients with Metabolic Syndrome.
    Jeon E; Park HA; Jo S; Kang H; Lee JY
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 225():510-4. PubMed ID: 27332253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.