These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
832 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25611898)
1. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma. Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations]. Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of endometrial cancers. Malinowski A; Majchrzak-Baczmańska D; Pogoda K; Maciołek-Blewniewska G; Antosiak B Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 23700847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer. Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma. Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Telelap ALF-X vs Standard Laparoscopy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study. Gueli Alletti S; Rossitto C; Cianci S; Restaino S; Costantini B; Fanfani F; Fagotti A; Cosentino F; Scambia G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 26602025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer. Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Mar; 120(3):413-8. PubMed ID: 21194735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) versus total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in endometrial carcinoma: prospective cohort study. Devaja O; Samara I; Papadopoulos AJ Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 May; 20(4):570-5. PubMed ID: 20686375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia. Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of outcomes following laparoscopic and open hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial carcinoma. Ruan XC; Wong WL; Yeong HQ; Lim YKT Singapore Med J; 2018 Jul; 59(7):366-369. PubMed ID: 30109355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]