These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25613035)

  • 21. What does it mean when age is related to recidivism among sex offenders?
    Rice ME; Harris GT
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Apr; 38(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 23876093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do PCL-R scores from state or defense experts best predict future misconduct among civilly committed sex offenders?
    Boccaccini MT; Turner DB; Murrie DC; Rufino KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):159-69. PubMed ID: 22667805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk and the preventive detention of sex offenders in Australia and the United States.
    Mercado CC; Ogloff JR
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 17157911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of acknowledging mock jurors' feelings on affective and cognitive biases: it depends on the sample.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):331-57. PubMed ID: 21766326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Classifying sexual offenders: an empirical model for generating type-specific approaches to intervention.
    Woessner G
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Jun; 54(3):327-45. PubMed ID: 19293286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The civil commitment of sexually violent predators: a unique Texas approach.
    Bailey RK
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 12539908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Violent sex offenses: how are they best measured from official records?
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Cormier C
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Aug; 30(4):525-41. PubMed ID: 16770703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An exploration of the latent constructs of the STATIC-99.
    Allen BP; Pflugradt DM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2014 Nov; 58(11):1376-88. PubMed ID: 23864523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Zoophilia and the law: legal responses to a rare paraphilia.
    Holoyda B; Newman W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 25492066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preventative detention decisions: reliance on expert assessments and evidence of partisan allegiance within the Canadian context.
    Blais J
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Feb; 33(1):74-91. PubMed ID: 25693952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Is the court-ordered treatment indication by the expert based on a medical diagnosis?].
    Spriet H; Abondo M; Naudet F; Bouvet R; Le Gueut M
    Encephale; 2014 Sep; 40(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 24094867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic and risk profiles among civilly committed sex offenders in Washington State.
    Jackson RL; Richards HJ
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2007 Jun; 51(3):313-23. PubMed ID: 17478861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Applying Collaborative Justice to Sexually Violent Predator Civil Commitment.
    Sreenivasan S; Hoffman A; Cahan J; Azizian A; Weinberger LE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):496-508. PubMed ID: 32680849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing sexual offenders at the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario) and the Florida Civil Commitment Center.
    Wilson RJ; Looman J; Abracen J; Pake DR
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2013 Mar; 57(3):377-95. PubMed ID: 22262344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Washington State's unscientific approach to the problem of repeat sex offenders.
    Brody AL; Green R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):343-56. PubMed ID: 7841506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sexual predator civil commitment: a comparison of selected and released offenders.
    Levenson JS
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2004 Dec; 48(6):638-48. PubMed ID: 15538023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Outpatient civil commitment in Texas for management and treatment of sexually violent predators: a preliminary report.
    Meyer WJ; Molett M; Richards CD; Arnold L; Latham J
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 12971181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reality check: a comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA; Lieberman JD
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):730-50. PubMed ID: 19856483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Loathing the sinner, medicalizing the sin: why sexually violent predator statutes are unjust.
    Douard J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 17157910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Field validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in sex offender risk assessment.
    Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT; Caperton J; Rufino K
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Jun; 24(2):524-9. PubMed ID: 22023560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.