161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25613389)
1. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review.
Basaran D; Dusek L; Majek O; Cibula D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):3033-40. PubMed ID: 25613389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs. conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Bae JW; Han M; Cho YJ; Park JW; Oh SR; Kim SJ; Choe SY; Yun JH; Lee Y
Mol Clin Oncol; 2020 Feb; 12(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 31929888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy and Radical Hysterectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Xue Z; Zhu X; Teng Y
Cell Physiol Biochem; 2016; 38(5):1841-50. PubMed ID: 27160267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Spagnolo E; Clarizia R; Casadio P; Seracchioli R; Ghezzi F; Mautone D; Bruni F; Uccella S
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):e10. PubMed ID: 33300311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
Ditto A; Bogani G; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Lopez C; Perotto S; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 May; 29(3):e41. PubMed ID: 29533024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
van Gent MDJM; Rademaker M; van der Veer JCB; van Poelgeest MIE; Gaarenstroom KN; Putter H; Trimbos JBMZ; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 28704329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.
Yin S; Ma SN; Zhang YQ; Shi TY; Xiang LB; Ren YL; Zang RY
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):380-386. PubMed ID: 30217291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 30759291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Controlled Study on Vaginal Blood Flow During Sexual Arousal Among Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Survivors Treated With Conventional Radical or Nerve-Sparing Surgery With or Without Radiotherapy.
Bakker RM; Pieterse QD; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Trimbos BJBMZ; Creutzberg CL; Kenter GG; de Kroon CD; Ter Kuile MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jun; 27(5):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 28498243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
