BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25613407)

  • 1. CORR Insights(®): There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Porcher R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2042-4. PubMed ID: 25613407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. There Are No Differences in Short- to Mid-term Survivorship Among Total Hip-bearing Surface Options: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Wyles CC; Jimenez-Almonte JH; Murad MH; Norambuena-Morales GA; Cabanela ME; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2031-41. PubMed ID: 25516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):300-303. PubMed ID: 27844400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CORR Insights(®): Early Lessons From a Worldwide, Multicenter, Followup Study of the Recalled Articular Surface Replacement Hip System.
    Argenson JN
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 26349441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CORR Insights(®): do patients with a failed metal-on-metal hip implant with a pseudotumor present differences in their peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations?
    Hallab NJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3915-7. PubMed ID: 26463565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CORR Insights(®): No Difference in Reoperations at 2 Years Between Ceramic-on-metal and Metal-on-metal THA: A Randomized Trial.
    Collier JP
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):456-8. PubMed ID: 26290340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Is the Rerevision Rate After Revising a Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? Analysis From the AOANJRR.
    Wong JM; Liu YL; Graves S; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3458-64. PubMed ID: 25721576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Faceoff: Instability After THA: The Potential Role of the Bearing Surface.
    Parvizi J; Sedel L; Dunbar MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Apr; 476(4):678-683. PubMed ID: 29543657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Arthroplasty: Is There an Association Between Infection and Bearing Surface Type?
    Pitto RP; Sedel L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2213-8. PubMed ID: 27249955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hard-on-Hard Bearings Are Associated With Increased Noise Generation in Young Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroplasty.
    Nam D; Barrack T; Johnson SR; Nunley RM; Barrack RL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2115-22. PubMed ID: 26911973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CORR Insights(®): acetate templating on digital images is more accurate than computer-based templating for total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3760-1. PubMed ID: 26013154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CORR Insights(®): Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
    Mont MA; Elmallah RK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):399-401. PubMed ID: 26754209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With Metasul Bearings Provides Good Results in Active Young Patients: A Concise Followup.
    Delaunay CP; Putman S; Puliéro B; Bégin M; Migaud H; Bonnomet F
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2126-33. PubMed ID: 27278679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
    Amstutz H; Le Duff M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3981-2. PubMed ID: 26354177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reply to letter to the editor: do complication rates differ by gender after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty? A systematic review.
    Haughom BD; Erickson BJ; Hellman MD; Jacobs JJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3983-4. PubMed ID: 26400250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CORR Insights(®): primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve.
    D'Antonio JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3788-9. PubMed ID: 26092678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three metal-on-metal hip replacement devices from the same manufacturer--a short- to mid-term survival.
    Kostensalo I; Junnila M; Mokka J; Virolainen P; Vahlberg T; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Jun; 80(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 25090796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CORR Insights(®): Increased Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Associated With a Unique Cementless Stem Design.
    Parvizi J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2054-5. PubMed ID: 25560961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter to the Editor regarding 'How symmetric are metal-on-metal hip resurfacing patients during gait? Insights for the rehabilitation'.
    Wiik AV; Logishetty K; Boughton O; Aqil A; Cobb JP
    J Biomech; 2017 Oct; 63():203. PubMed ID: 28859859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 50 years ago in CORR: Biomechanics of hip prostheses. Duncan C. McKeever, MD CORR 1961;19:187-199.
    Brand RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):626-7. PubMed ID: 22101406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.