These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25614269)

  • 1. Candidacy criteria for paediatric bilateral cochlear implantation in the United Kingdom.
    Vickers D; Summerfield Q; Lovett R
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16 Suppl 1():S48-9. PubMed ID: 25614269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bilateral cochlear implantation for hearing-impaired children: criterion of candidacy derived from an observational study.
    Lovett RE; Vickers DA; Summerfield AQ
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 25170781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Sequential cochlear implantation in an adult with extremely asymmetric hearing-experience].
    Giourgas A; Gärtner L; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2013 Nov; 92(11):756-8. PubMed ID: 23873276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiogram and cochlear implant candidacy--UK perspective.
    Chundu S; Flynn SL
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jul; 15(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 24144046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing candidacy for bilateral cochlear implants: a survey of practices in the United States and Canada.
    Schwartz SR; Watson SD; Backous DD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 May; 13(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 22333494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric-acoustic stimulation: for whom, in which ear, and how.
    Ching TY; Incerti P; Plant K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16 Suppl 1():S12-5. PubMed ID: 25614258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiometry-Based Screening Procedure for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
    Hoppe U; Hast A; Hocke T
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1001-5. PubMed ID: 25700016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral audit.
    Cullington HE; Bele D; Brinton JC; Lutman ME
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S15-8. PubMed ID: 21917211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural history of contralateral residual hearing in unilateral cochlear implant users - long-term findings.
    Yehudai N; Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1073-6. PubMed ID: 22691155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of hearing preservation outcomes in routine cochlear implant care: Implications for candidacy.
    Verschuur C; Hellier W; Teo C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Apr; 17 Suppl 1():62-5. PubMed ID: 27099115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The influence of insertion depth on the preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation].
    Neumann M; Aschendorff A; Schipper J; Laszig R; Klenzner T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 15712047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating inter-aural hearing preservation in bilateral paediatric cochlear implantation.
    Jones HAS; Powell HRF; Hall A; Lavy J; Shaida A; Saeed S; Khalil S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Nov; 19(6):307-311. PubMed ID: 30010498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of outcomes in children with hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Olds J; Gaboury I; McCrae R; Schramm D; Durieux-Smith A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2012 Feb; 13(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 22340747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B; Dillier N; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Morera Perez C; Morgon AH; Müller-Deile J; Ramos Macias A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysical Map Stability in Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: Comparing Current Audiology Methods to a New Statistical Definition.
    Domville-Lewis C; Santa Maria PL; Upson G; Chester-Browne R; Atlas MD
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 25710778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fitting of the hearing system affects partial deafness cochlear implant performance.
    Polak M; Lorens A; Helbig S; McDonald S; McDonald S; Vermeire K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():117-21. PubMed ID: 21756595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimodal Hearing Aid Retention after Unilateral Cochlear Implantation.
    Devocht EM; George EL; Janssen AM; Stokroos RJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(6):383-93. PubMed ID: 26461124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: implant the better- or worse-hearing ear?
    Patki A; Tucci DL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Jan; 125(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 25303740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implantation in children.
    Kim LS; Jeong SW; Lee YM; Kim JS
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Feb; 37(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 19897328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations for cochlear implantation of children with sudden, fluctuating hearing loss.
    Sweetow RW; Rosbe KW; Philliposian C; Miller MT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005; 16(10):770-80. PubMed ID: 16515130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.