465 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25614415)
1. Comparison of neointimal coverage and extra-stent lumen between sirolimus and everolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
Oda T; Okamura T; Yamada J; Miyagi N; Uehara H; Nao T; Tateishi H; Maeda T; Nakamura T; Shiraishi K; Nakashima T; Nishimura S; Miura T; Matsuzaki M; Yano M
Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 25614415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Difference in vascular response between sirolimus-eluting- and everolimus-eluting stents in ostial left circumflex artery after unprotected left main as observed by optical coherence tomography.
Fujino Y; Attizzani GF; Tahara S; Naganuma T; Takagi K; Yabushita H; Wang W; Tanaka K; Matsumoto T; Kawamoto H; Yamada Y; Amano S; Watanabe Y; Warisawa T; Sato T; Mitomo S; Kurita N; Ishiguro H; Hozawa K; Tsukahara T; Motosuke M; Bezerra HG; Nakamura S; Nakamura S
Int J Cardiol; 2017 Mar; 230():284-292. PubMed ID: 28065691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of neointimal coverage between everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography substudy of the RESET (Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial).
Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Kawamura M; Sumiyoshi T; Ino Y; Morino Y; Tanabe K; Kadota K; Kimura T;
EuroIntervention; 2015 Sep; 11(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 26390517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in Vessel Healing Between Sirolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for Bifurcation Lesions: The J-REVERSE Optical Coherence Tomography Substudy.
Terashita D; Otake H; Shinke T; Murasato Y; Kinoshita Y; Yamawaki M; Takeda Y; Fujii K; Yamada S; Shimada Y; Yamashita T; Yumoto K; Hirata K
Can J Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 32(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 26481078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.
Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.
Koppara T; Tada T; Xhepa E; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Ibrahim T; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Joner M
Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 258():42-49. PubMed ID: 29544956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.
Ohtani H; Kimura S; Sugiyama T; Hishikari K; Misawa T; Mizusawa M; Hayasaka K; Yamakami Y; Kojima K; Sagawa Y; Hikita H; Ashikaga T; Takahashi A; Isobe M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 27761750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of early strut coverage between zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents using optical coherence tomography.
Kim S; Kim JS; Shin DH; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Cho YK; Nam CW; Hur SH; Jang Y; Hong MK
Am J Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 111(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 23040589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Favorable neointimal coverage in everolimus-eluting stent at 9 months after stent implantation: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
Choi HH; Kim JS; Yoon DH; Hong KS; Kim TH; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 21442265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the stenting of saphenous vein graft (SOS) Xience V Study: use of the everolimus-eluting stent in saphenous vein graft lesions.
Papayannis AC; Michael TT; Yangirova D; Abdel-Karim AR; Kohlhaas J; Mahmood A; Addo T; Haagen D; Makke L; Roesle M; Rangan B; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 24(8):390-4. PubMed ID: 22865309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year vessel healing after everolimus-eluting stent implantation: serial assessment by optical coherence tomography.
Taniguchi Y; Otake H; Shinke T; Nakagawa M; Hariki H; Inoue T; Osue T; Hiranuma N; Nishio R; Kinutani H; Iwasaki M; Konishi A; Kuroda M; Hirata K
J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 65(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 25082295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the performance of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents by optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy.
Masawa T; Abe S; Toyoda S; Sakuma M; Nasuno T; Kageyama M; Tokura M; Koizumi S; Taguchi I; Inoue T
Heart Vessels; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1230-8. PubMed ID: 26271923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent for vascular healing response: serial 3-month and 12-month optical coherence tomography study.
Kim SJ; Lee H; Cho JM; Park CB; Kim W; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Kim CJ; Jang IK
Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Aug; 24(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23722649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of different stent alloys on human vascular response to everolimus-eluting stent: an optical coherence tomography study: the OCTEVEREST.
Guagliumi G; Capodanno D; Ikejima H; Bezerra HG; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Fiocca L; Lortkipanidze N; Vassileva A; Tahara S; Valsecchi O; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):510-8. PubMed ID: 22431208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.
Teeuwen K; Spoormans EM; Bennett J; Dubois C; Desmet W; Ughi GJ; Belmans A; Kelder JC; Tijssen JGP; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ; Adriaenssens T
EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 28512069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of late strut coverage patterns between first-generation drug-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stent.
Toledano Delgado FJ; Alvarez-Ossorio MP; de Lezo Cruz-Conde JS; Bellido FM; Romero Moreno MÁ; Fernández-Aceytuno AM; de Lezo Herrerosde Tejada JS; Pineda SO; Saint-Gerons JM; Pavlovic D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 24174291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparisons of detailed arterial healing response at seven months following implantation of an everolimus- or sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Sawada T; Shinke T; Otake H; Mizoguchi T; Iwasaki M; Emoto T; Terashita D; Mizuguchi T; Okamoto H; Matsuo Y; Kim SK; Takarada A; Yokoyama M
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):960-6. PubMed ID: 23164597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-year head to head comparison of the neointimal response between sirolimus eluting stent with reservoir technology and everolimus eluting stent: an optical coherence tomography study.
Shiratori Y; Brugaletta S; Alvarez-Contreras L; Azpeitia Y; Ospino N; Gaido S; Delahanty A; Santos A; Martin-Yuste V; Masotti M; Serruys PW; Windecker S; Sabaté M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E428-36. PubMed ID: 23441068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
