These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25616279)

  • 1. Demystifying theory and its use in improvement.
    Davidoff F; Dixon-Woods M; Leviton L; Michie S
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Mar; 24(3):228-38. PubMed ID: 25616279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How to build up the actionable knowledge base: the role of 'best fit' framework synthesis for studies of improvement in healthcare.
    Booth A; Carroll C
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Nov; 24(11):700-8. PubMed ID: 26306609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using developmental evaluation to support knowledge translation: reflections from a large-scale quality improvement project in Indigenous primary healthcare.
    Laycock A; Bailie J; Matthews V; Bailie R
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2019 Jul; 17(1):70. PubMed ID: 31324251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool.
    Birken SA; Rohweder CL; Powell BJ; Shea CM; Scott J; Leeman J; Grewe ME; Alexis Kirk M; Damschroder L; Aldridge WA; Haines ER; Straus S; Presseau J
    Implement Sci; 2018 Nov; 13(1):143. PubMed ID: 30466450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving medicines management for people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals to develop a theory-informed intervention.
    Barry HE; Bedford LE; McGrattan M; Ryan C; Passmore AP; Robinson AL; Molloy GJ; Darcy CM; Buchanan H; Hughes CM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Feb; 20(1):120. PubMed ID: 32059718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The art and science of non-evaluation evaluation.
    Jones L
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2018 Oct; 23(4):262-267. PubMed ID: 30235950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using implementation tools to design and conduct quality improvement projects for faster and more effective improvement.
    Ovretveit J; Mittman B; Rubenstein L; Ganz DA
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2017 Oct; 30(8):755-768. PubMed ID: 28958203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
    Carter YH; Shaw S; Macfarlane F
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 2002 Feb; (81):iii-vi, 1-72. PubMed ID: 12049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving capacity in ethnicity and health research: report of a tailored programme for NHS Public Health practitioners.
    Salway S; Piercy H; Chowbey P; Brewins L; Dhoot P
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2013 Oct; 14(4):330-40. PubMed ID: 22883709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying adult development theories to improvement science.
    Kjellström S; Andersson AC
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2017 Aug; 30(7):617-627. PubMed ID: 28809588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does quality improvement face a legitimacy crisis? Poor quality studies, small effects.
    Groene O
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16(3):131-2. PubMed ID: 21719476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Criteria for evaluating programme theory diagrams in quality improvement initiatives: a structured method for appraisal.
    Issen L; Woodcock T; McNicholas C; Lennox L; Reed JE
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2018 Aug; 30(7):508-513. PubMed ID: 29635294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis.
    Glenton C; Colvin CJ; Carlsen B; Swartz A; Lewin S; Noyes J; Rashidian A
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD010414. PubMed ID: 24101553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Designing quality improvement initiatives: the action effect method, a structured approach to identifying and articulating programme theory.
    Reed JE; McNicholas C; Woodcock T; Issen L; Bell D
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Dec; 23(12):1040-8. PubMed ID: 25319412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme - improvements to NHS orthopaedic care in England: study protocol.
    Barratt H; Turner S; Hutchings A; Pizzo E; Hudson E; Briggs T; Hurd R; Day J; Yates R; Gikas P; Morris S; Fulop NJ; Raine R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 28115018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
    Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention.
    Vachon B; Désorcy B; Camirand M; Rodrigue J; Quesnel L; Guimond C; Labelle M; Fournier J; Grimshaw J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Mar; 13():106. PubMed ID: 23514278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science.
    Kislov R; Pope C; Martin GP; Wilson PM
    Implement Sci; 2019 Dec; 14(1):103. PubMed ID: 31823787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.