These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25616279)

  • 21. Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme - improvements to NHS orthopaedic care in England: study protocol.
    Barratt H; Turner S; Hutchings A; Pizzo E; Hudson E; Briggs T; Hurd R; Day J; Yates R; Gikas P; Morris S; Fulop NJ; Raine R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):71. PubMed ID: 28115018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
    Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention.
    Vachon B; Désorcy B; Camirand M; Rodrigue J; Quesnel L; Guimond C; Labelle M; Fournier J; Grimshaw J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2013 Mar; 13():106. PubMed ID: 23514278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science.
    Kislov R; Pope C; Martin GP; Wilson PM
    Implement Sci; 2019 Dec; 14(1):103. PubMed ID: 31823787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The time has come: Embedded implementation research for health care improvement.
    Churruca K; Ludlow K; Taylor N; Long JC; Best S; Braithwaite J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Jun; 25(3):373-380. PubMed ID: 30632246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Statistical process control and interrupted time series: a golden opportunity for impact evaluation in quality improvement.
    Fretheim A; Tomic O
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):748-52. PubMed ID: 26316541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review.
    Vindrola-Padros C; Pape T; Utley M; Fulop NJ
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Jan; 26(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 27129492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interventions targeted at primary care practitioners to improve the identification and referral of patients with co-morbid obesity: a realist review protocol.
    Blane DN; Macdonald S; Morrison D; O'Donnell CA
    Syst Rev; 2015 May; 4():61. PubMed ID: 25927993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.
    Zamboni K; Baker U; Tyagi M; Schellenberg J; Hill Z; Hanson C
    Implement Sci; 2020 May; 15(1):27. PubMed ID: 32366269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation.
    Locock L; Montgomery C; Parkin S; Chisholm A; Bostock J; Dopson S; Gager M; Gibbons E; Graham C; King J; Martin A; Powell J; Ziebland S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2020 Jul; 25(3):151-161. PubMed ID: 32056464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Understanding Determinants of Sustainability Through a Realist Investigation of a Large-Scale Quality Improvement Initiative (Lean): A Refined Program Theory.
    Flynn R; Scott SD
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2020 Jan; 52(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 31702091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Breaking the silence: Determinants of voice for quality improvement in hospitals.
    Nembhard IM; Labao I; Savage S
    Health Care Manage Rev; 2015; 40(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 24901299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Blending Quality Improvement and Research Methods for Implementation Science, Part I: Design and Data Collection.
    Granger BB; Shah BR
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2015; 26(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 26200736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating deceased organ donation: a programme theory approach.
    Manzano A; Pawson R
    J Health Organ Manag; 2014; 28(3):366-85. PubMed ID: 25080650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implementing large-scale quality improvement: lessons from The Productive Ward: Releasing Time to Care.
    Morrow E; Robert G; Maben J; Griffiths P
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur; 2012; 25(4):237-53. PubMed ID: 22755479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.
    Ogrinc G; Davies L; Goodman D; Batalden P; Davidoff F; Stevens D
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2016 Dec; 25(12):986-992. PubMed ID: 26369893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.