These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25616714)

  • 1. Role of Rhipicephalus microplus cheliceral receptors in gustation and host differentiation.
    Ferreira LL; Soares SF; de Oliveira Filho JG; Oliveira TT; Pérez de León AA; Borges LM
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2015 Apr; 6(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 25616714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Study on cheliceral sensilla of the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: Ixodidae) involved in taste perception of phagostimulants.
    Soares SF; Louly CC; Marion-Poll F; Ribeiro MF; Borges LM
    Acta Trop; 2013 Apr; 126(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 23352572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK
    Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation of cutaneous inflammation induced by ticks in contrasting phenotypes of infestation in bovines.
    Carvalho WA; Franzin AM; Abatepaulo AR; de Oliveira CJ; Moré DD; da Silva JS; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK
    Vet Parasitol; 2010 Feb; 167(2-4):260-73. PubMed ID: 19836891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immune recognition of salivary proteins from the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus differs according to the genotype of the bovine host.
    Garcia GR; Maruyama SR; Nelson KT; Ribeiro JM; Gardinassi LG; Maia AA; Ferreira BR; Kooyman FN; de Miranda Santos IK
    Parasit Vectors; 2017 Mar; 10(1):144. PubMed ID: 28288696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle.
    Constantinoiu CC; Jackson LA; Jorgensen WK; Lew-Tabor AE; Piper EK; Mayer DG; Venus B; Jonsson NN
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Jun; 40(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 20109460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bovine genetic resistance effects on biological traits of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Biegelmeyer P; Nizoli LQ; da Silva SS; dos Santos TR; Dionello NJ; Gulias-Gomes CC; Cardoso FF
    Vet Parasitol; 2015 Mar; 208(3-4):231-7. PubMed ID: 25648284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bagnall NH; Kongsuwan KK; Lew AE; Jonsson NN
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2008 Nov; 126(1-2):110-9. PubMed ID: 18676027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the physiological state on infestation by Rhipicephalus microplus in dairy cows.
    da Silva JB; Rangel CP; de Azevedo Baêta B; da Fonseca AH
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2013 Feb; 4(1-2):52-6. PubMed ID: 23238247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rhipicephalus microplus lipocalins (LRMs): genomic identification and analysis of the bovine immune response using in silico predicted B and T cell epitopes.
    Rodriguez-Valle M; Moolhuijzen P; Piper EK; Weiss O; Vance M; Bellgard M; Lew-Tabor A
    Int J Parasitol; 2013 Aug; 43(9):739-52. PubMed ID: 23747800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Profile of cattle breed sensitivity to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Barros JC; Garcia MV; Higa LOS; Souza ADS; Andreotti R
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2024 Sep; 15(5):102363. PubMed ID: 38852540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Host resistance in cattle to infestation with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Jonsson NN; Piper EK; Constantinoiu CC
    Parasite Immunol; 2014 Nov; 36(11):553-9. PubMed ID: 25313455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhipicephalus microplus and Amblyomma sculptum (Ixodidae) infestation of Nellore cattle (Bos taurus indicus) in a farm of the Brazilian Cerrado: seasonality and infestation patterns.
    de Siqueira SM; da Costa Maia R; do Nascimento Ramos V; da Silva Rodrigues V; Szabó MPJ
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2021 Jul; 84(3):659-672. PubMed ID: 34138398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle.
    Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Population dynamics and evaluation of the partial selective treatment of crossbreed steers naturally infested with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in a herd from the state of Minas Gerais in Brazil.
    Gomes LV; Lopes WD; Teixeira WF; Maciel WG; Cruz BC; Felippelli G; Buzzulini C; Soares VE; de Melo DP; Bichuette MA; Gonçalves Junior G; da Costa AJ
    Vet Parasitol; 2016 Apr; 220():72-6. PubMed ID: 26995724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cattle Tick
    Tabor AE; Ali A; Rehman G; Rocha Garcia G; Zangirolamo AF; Malardo T; Jonsson NN
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2017; 7():506. PubMed ID: 29322033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: distinct acute phase proteins vary during infestations according to the genetic composition of the bovine hosts, Bos taurus and Bos indicus.
    Carvalho WA; Bechara GH; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; da Silva JS; de Miranda Santos IK
    Exp Parasitol; 2008 Apr; 118(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 18171576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systemic alterations of bovine hemostasis due to Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus infestation.
    Reck J; Berger M; Terra RM; Marks FS; da Silva Vaz I; Guimarães JA; Termignoni C
    Res Vet Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 18571684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative microarray analysis of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus expression profiles of larvae pre-attachment and feeding adult female stages on Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle.
    Rodriguez-Valle M; Lew-Tabor A; Gondro C; Moolhuijzen P; Vance M; Guerrero FD; Bellgard M; Jorgensen W
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Jul; 11():437. PubMed ID: 20637126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.