These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25617021)
1. Sliding of the load carrier in third-generation intramedullary nails for proximal femur fractures: an in vitro mechanical comparison study. Konstantinidis L; Grünewald H; Hauschild O; Schröter S; Hirschmüller A; Südkamp NP; Helwig P Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2015 Feb; 229(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 25617021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures. Wang Y; Chen W; Zhang L; Xiong C; Zhang X; Yu K; Ju J; Chen X; Zhang D; Zhang Y Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(9):2245-2255. PubMed ID: 35848160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical characteristic differences of two new types of intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fractures of femur: a comparative study based on finite element analysis. Tang Z; Lv Y; Zhu Z; Lu Y; Zhou H; Zhang Y; Liao Y; Wang B J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 Sep; 19(1):583. PubMed ID: 39304891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The dynamics of proximal femoral nails: a clinical comparison between PFNA and Targon PF. Wild M; Jungbluth P; Thelen S; Laffrée Q; Gehrmann S; Betsch M; Windolf J; Hakimi M Orthopedics; 2010 Aug; 33(8):. PubMed ID: 20704115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do PFNA devices and Intertan nails both have the same effects in the treatment of trochanteric fractures? A prospective clinical study. Seyhan M; Turkmen I; Unay K; Ozkut AT J Orthop Sci; 2015 Nov; 20(6):1053-61. PubMed ID: 26197959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Locked minimally invasive plating versus fourth generation nailing in the treatment of AO/OTA 31A2.2 fractures: A biomechanical comparison of PCCP(®) and Intertan nail(®). Knobe M; Gradl G; Buecking B; Gackstatter S; Sönmez TT; Ghassemi A; Stromps JP; Prescher A; Pape HC Injury; 2015 Aug; 46(8):1475-82. PubMed ID: 25997559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical difference analysis of new and classic intramedullary nail devices in the treatment of basal femoral neck fractures: finite element analysis. Tang Z; Zhu Z; Lv Y; Lu Y; Huang S; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Wang B BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Sep; 25(1):697. PubMed ID: 39223520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail. Wang H; Yang W; Ding K; Zhu Y; Zhang Y; Ren C; Zhao K; Zhang Q; Chen W; Zhang Y Int Orthop; 2022 Feb; 46(2):341-350. PubMed ID: 34704144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative finite element analysis of three implants fixing stable and unstable subtrochanteric femoral fractures: Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), Proximal Femoral Locking Plate (PFLP), and Reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS). Wang J; Ma JX; Lu B; Bai HH; Wang Y; Ma XL Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 106(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 31345739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis comparing titanium elastic nails with locked plating in two simulated pediatric femur fracture models. Porter SE; Booker GR; Parsell DE; Weber MD; Russell GV; Woodall J; Wagner M; Neubauer T J Pediatr Orthop; 2012 Sep; 32(6):587-93. PubMed ID: 22892620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and reconstruction nail for ipsilateral fractures of hip and femoral shaft]. Wang J; Yang T; Ning J; Fang Y; Wang G; Lan Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):905-9. PubMed ID: 23012919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral fail antirotation in the treatment of reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures. İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K Acta Orthop Belg; 2018 Jun; 84(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 30462594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cadaveric biomechanical study comparing the ease of femoral nail insertion: 1.0- vs 1.5-m bow designs. Yuan H; Acklin Y; Varga P; Gueorguiev B; Windolf M; Epari D; Schuetz M; Schmutz B Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):663-671. PubMed ID: 28374092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effectiveness comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly patients]. Shen G Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 26(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 22792760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medial sustainable nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation in treating AO/OTA 31-A2.3 fractures: Finite element analysis and biomechanical evaluation. Li J; Han L; Zhang H; Zhao Z; Su X; Zhou J; Li C; Yin P; Hao M; Wang K; Xu G; Zhang L; Zhang L; Tang P Injury; 2019 Mar; 50(3):648-656. PubMed ID: 30827705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The biomechanical study of rotating-arm self-locking intramedullary nails in comminuted femoral shaft fractures]. Fang Y; Fu X; Chi L; Wang G; Yang T Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Oct; 23(5):1041-4. PubMed ID: 17121350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative biomechanical study of reversed less invasive stabilization system and proximal femoral nail antirotation for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Chen Y; Liu S; Lin P; Wang Y; Wang J; Tao J; Cai R Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(23):4124-9. PubMed ID: 25430461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures--a biomechanical cadaver study. Fensky F; Nüchtern JV; Kolb JP; Huber S; Rupprecht M; Jauch SY; Sellenschloh K; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Rueger JM; Lehmann W Injury; 2013 Jun; 44(6):802-7. PubMed ID: 23545113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]