312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25617202)
1. Effect of self-collection of HPV DNA offered by community health workers at home visits on uptake of screening for cervical cancer (the EMA study): a population-based cluster-randomised trial.
Arrossi S; Thouyaret L; Herrero R; Campanera A; Magdaleno A; Cuberli M; Barletta P; Laudi R; Orellana L;
Lancet Glob Health; 2015 Feb; 3(2):e85-94. PubMed ID: 25617202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of scaling-up of HPV self-collection offered by community health workers at home visits to increase screening among socially vulnerable under-screened women in Jujuy Province, Argentina.
Arrossi S; Paolino M; Thouyaret L; Laudi R; Campanera A
Implement Sci; 2017 Feb; 12(1):17. PubMed ID: 28193227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of HPV self-collection kits on cervical cancer screening uptake among under-screened women from low-income US backgrounds (MBMT-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Pretsch PK; Spees LP; Brewer NT; Hudgens MG; Sanusi B; Rohner E; Miller E; Jackson SL; Barclay L; Carter A; Wheeler SB; Smith JS
Lancet Public Health; 2023 Jun; 8(6):e411-e421. PubMed ID: 37182529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-collection of vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention (MARCH): a community-based randomised controlled trial.
Lazcano-Ponce E; Lorincz AT; Cruz-Valdez A; Salmerón J; Uribe P; Velasco-Mondragón E; Nevarez PH; Acosta RD; Hernández-Avila M
Lancet; 2011 Nov; 378(9806):1868-73. PubMed ID: 22051739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed-methods approach to evaluate an mHealth intervention to increase adherence to triage of human papillomavirus-positive women who have performed self-collection (the ATICA study): study protocol for a hybrid type I cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial.
Arrossi S; Paolino M; Orellana L; Thouyaret L; Kohler RE; Viswanath K
Trials; 2019 Feb; 20(1):148. PubMed ID: 30808379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human papillomavirus testing for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer: final results of the POBASCAM randomised controlled trial.
Rijkaart DC; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Bulkmans NW; Heideman DA; Kenter GG; Cuzick J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 22177579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.
Lilliecreutz C; Karlsson H; Spetz Holm AC
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235202. PubMed ID: 32614875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of an mHealth intervention to increase adherence to triage of HPV DNA positive women who have performed self-collection (the ATICA study): A hybrid type I cluster randomised effectiveness-implementation trial.
Arrossi S; Paolino M; Antelo VS; Thouyaret L; Kohler RE; Cuberli M; Flores L; Serra V; Viswanath K; Orellana L;
Lancet Reg Health Am; 2022 May; 9():. PubMed ID: 35655914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Programmatic human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer prevention in the Jujuy Demonstration Project in Argentina: a population-based, before-and-after retrospective cohort study.
Arrossi S; Paolino M; Laudi R; Gago J; Campanera A; Marín O; Falcón C; Serra V; Herrero R; Thouyaret L
Lancet Glob Health; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e772-e783. PubMed ID: 31097279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating a community-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Western Kenya: a descriptive study.
Swanson M; Ibrahim S; Blat C; Oketch S; Olwanda E; Maloba M; Huchko MJ
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 29970063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland.
Duke P; Godwin M; Ratnam S; Dawson L; Fontaine D; Lear A; Traverso-Yepez M; Graham W; Ravalia M; Mugford G; Pike A; Fortier J; Peach M
BMC Womens Health; 2015 Jun; 15():47. PubMed ID: 26060041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two invitation-based methods for human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling with usual care among un- and under-screened Māori, Pacific and Asian women: study protocol for a randomised controlled community trial to examine the effect of self-sampling on participation in cervical-cancer screening.
Brewer N; Bartholomew K; Maxwell A; Grant J; McPherson G; Wihongi H; Bromhead C; Scott N; Crengle S; Cunningham C; Douwes J; Potter JD
BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1198. PubMed ID: 31815615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology.
Zehbe I; Jackson R; Wood B; Weaver B; Escott N; Severini A; Krajden M; Bishop L; Morrisseau K; Ogilvie G; Burchell AN; Little J
BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e011754. PubMed ID: 27855089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's intentions to self-collect samples for human papillomavirus testing in an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Smith LW; Khurshed F; van Niekerk DJ; Krajden M; Greene SB; Hobbs S; Coldman AJ; Franco EL; Ogilvie GS
BMC Public Health; 2014 Oct; 14():1060. PubMed ID: 25303975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Ethiopia by Self-Sampling HPV DNA Compared to Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
Gizaw M; Teka B; Ruddies F; Abebe T; Kaufmann AM; Worku A; Wienke A; Jemal A; Addissie A; Kantelhardt EJ
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2019 Sep; 12(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 31337647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uptake of community-based, self-collected HPV testing vs. visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in Kampala, Uganda: preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial.
Moses E; Pedersen HN; Mitchell SM; Sekikubo M; Mwesigwa D; Singer J; Biryabarema C; Byamugisha JK; Money DM; Ogilvie GS
Trop Med Int Health; 2015 Oct; 20(10):1355-67. PubMed ID: 26031572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized Intervention of Self-Collected Sampling for Human Papillomavirus Testing in Under-Screened Rural Women: Uptake of Screening and Acceptability.
Racey CS; Gesink DC; Burchell AN; Trivers S; Wong T; Rebbapragada A
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2016 May; 25(5):489-97. PubMed ID: 26598955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, controlled trial of two strategies of offering the home-based HPV self-sampling test to non- participants in the Flemish cervical cancer screening program.
Kellen E; Benoy I; Vanden Broeck D; Martens P; Bogers JP; Haelens A; Van Limbergen E
Int J Cancer; 2018 Aug; 143(4):861-868. PubMed ID: 29569715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acceptability and Feasibility of HPV Self-Sampling as an Alternative Primary Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Population Groups: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wong EL; Cheung AW; Wong AY; Chan PK
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(17):. PubMed ID: 32867315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
