These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2561743)

  • 1. In vivo plaque formation on implant materials.
    Nakazato G; Tsuchiya H; Sato M; Yamauchi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 2561743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Studies on plaque formed on implants].
    Nakazato G
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Jun; 17(1):131-51. PubMed ID: 2134753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature.
    Subramani K; Jung RE; Molenberg A; Hammerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 19885401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to implant materials.
    Fujioka-Hirai Y; Akagawa Y; Minagi S; Tsuru H; Miyake Y; Suginaka H
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1987 Jul; 21(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 3038919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces.
    Bürgers R; Gerlach T; Hahnel S; Schwarz F; Handel G; Gosau M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 19912269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early dental plaque formation on toothbrushed titanium implant surfaces.
    Amarante ES; Chambrone L; Lotufo RF; Lima LA
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 19024258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations.
    Quirynen M; Bollen CM; Papaioannou W; Van Eldere J; van Steenberghe D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 8666447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental implant materials. I. Some effects of preparative procedures on surface topography.
    Smith DC; Pilliar RM; Chernecky R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1045-68. PubMed ID: 1663951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Culture surfaces coated with various implant materials affect chondrocyte growth and metabolism.
    Hambleton J; Schwartz Z; Khare A; Windeler SW; Luna M; Brooks BP; Dean DD; Boyan BD
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Jul; 12(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 7520486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dental implant materials. II. Preparative procedures and surface spectroscopic studies.
    Smith DC; Pilliar RM; Metson JB; McIntyre NS
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1991 Sep; 25(9):1069-84. PubMed ID: 1663952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development.
    Teughels W; Van Assche N; Sliepen I; Quirynen M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():68-81. PubMed ID: 16968383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study.
    Scarano A; Piattelli M; Caputi S; Favero GA; Piattelli A
    J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):292-6. PubMed ID: 15068118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study.
    Grössner-Schreiber B; Griepentrog M; Haustein I; Müller WD; Lange KP; Briedigkeit H; Göbel UB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 11737097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
    Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bacterial plaque retention on oral hard materials: effect of surface roughness, surface composition, and physisorbed polycarboxylate.
    McConnell MD; Liu Y; Nowak AP; Pilch S; Masters JG; Composto RJ
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Mar; 92(4):1518-27. PubMed ID: 19425078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of intracrevicular crown margins on gingival health: preliminary findings.
    Kancyper SG; Koka S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 11357072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of chlorhexidine and stannous fluoride on fibroblast attachment to different implant surfaces.
    Burchard WB; Cobb CM; Drisko CL; Killoy WJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(4):418-26. PubMed ID: 1668169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saliva-promoted adhesion of Streptococcus mutans MT8148 associates with dental plaque and caries experience.
    Shimotoyodome A; Kobayashi H; Tokimitsu I; Hase T; Inoue T; Matsukubo T; Takaesu Y
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface free energy and bacterial retention to saliva-coated dental implant materials--an in vitro study.
    Mabboux F; Ponsonnet L; Morrier JJ; Jaffrezic N; Barsotti O
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2004 Dec; 39(4):199-205. PubMed ID: 15555904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.