BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25618080)

  • 1. Sensitivity of odd-harmonic amplitudes to open quotient and skewing quotient in glottal airflow.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):502-4. PubMed ID: 25618080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
    Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation.
    Henrich N; d'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Mar; 115(3):1321-32. PubMed ID: 15058354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normalized amplitude quotient for parametrization of the glottal flow.
    Alku P; Bäckström T; Vilkman E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):701-10. PubMed ID: 12186049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability in the relationships among voice quality, harmonic amplitudes, open quotient, and glottal area waveform shape in sustained phonation.
    Kreiman J; Shue YL; Chen G; Iseli M; Gerratt BR; Neubauer J; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23039455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Skewing of the glottal flow with respect to the glottal area measured in natural production of vowels.
    Alku P; Murtola T; Malinen J; Geneid A; Vilkman E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2501. PubMed ID: 31671985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of air flow and medial adductory compression on vocal efficiency and glottal vibration.
    Berke GS; Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Trapp TK; Macagba C; Natividad M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Mar; 102(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 2108407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glottal Adduction and Subglottal Pressure in Singing.
    Herbst CT; Hess M; Müller F; Švec JG; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Jul; 29(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 25944295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contact quotient versus closed quotient: a comparative study on professional male singers.
    Lã FM; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 25510160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonatory control in male singing: a study of the effects of subglottal pressure, fundamental frequency, and mode of phonation on the voice source.
    Sundberg J; Titze I; Scherer R
    J Voice; 1993 Mar; 7(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 8353616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The difference between first and second harmonic amplitudes correlates between glottal airflow and neck-surface accelerometer signals during phonation.
    Mehta DD; Espinoza VM; Van Stan JH; Zañartu M; Hillman RE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):EL386. PubMed ID: 31153299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Just noticeable differences of open quotient and asymmetry coefficient in singing voice.
    Henrich N; Sundin G; Ambroise D; d'Alessandro C; Castellengo M; Doval B
    J Voice; 2003 Dec; 17(4):481-94. PubMed ID: 14740930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonation threshold pressure: a missing link in glottal aerodynamics.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2926-35. PubMed ID: 1629485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vocal intensity in speakers and singers.
    Titze IR; Sundberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2936-46. PubMed ID: 1629486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating perceived phonatory pressedness in singing from flow glottograms.
    Sundberg J; Thalén M; Alku P; Vilkman E
    J Voice; 2004 Mar; 18(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 15070224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on the glottal voice source of vocal loudness variation in untrained female and male voices.
    Sundberg J; Fahlstedt E; Morell A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Feb; 117(2):879-85. PubMed ID: 15759707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vocal intensity in falsetto phonation of a countertenor: an analysis by synthesis approach.
    Tom K; Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1667-76. PubMed ID: 11572375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measures of phonation type in Hmong.
    Huffman MK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):495-504. PubMed ID: 3558967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlates of the belt voice: a broader examination.
    Lebowitz A; Baken RJ
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 20236798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
    Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.