These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25618106)

  • 1. Overnight consolidation promotes generalization across talkers in the identification of nonnative speech sounds.
    Earle FS; Myers EB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 25618106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of overnight consolidation in the perceptual learning of non-native tonal contrasts.
    Qin Z; Zhang C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0221498. PubMed ID: 31830045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
    Atagi E; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetric interaural generalization of learning gains in a speech-in-noise identification task.
    Roth DA; Karni A; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):2627-34. PubMed ID: 26627741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Desirable and undesirable difficulties: Influences of variability, training schedule, and aptitude on nonnative phonetic learning.
    Fuhrmeister P; Myers EB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2049-2065. PubMed ID: 31970707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overnight changes to dual-memory processes reflected in speech-perceptual performance.
    Earle FS; Qi Z
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):231-243. PubMed ID: 34921334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonnative implicit phonetic training in multiple reverberant environments.
    Vlahou E; Seitz AR; Kopčo N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):935-947. PubMed ID: 30737758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Native phonological processing abilities predict post-consolidation nonnative contrast learning in adults.
    Earle FS; Arthur DT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Dec; 142(6):EL525. PubMed ID: 29289078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural representations for newly learned words are modulated by overnight consolidation, reading skill, and age.
    Landi N; Malins JG; Frost SJ; Magnuson JS; Molfese P; Ryherd K; Rueckl JG; Mencl WE; Pugh KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():133-144. PubMed ID: 29366948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and children.
    Hazan V; Markham D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3108-18. PubMed ID: 15603156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-native phonetic learning is destabilized by exposure to phonological variability before and after training.
    Fuhrmeister P; Myers EB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):EL448. PubMed ID: 29195416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure.
    Theodore RM; Myers EB; Lomibao JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1068-78. PubMed ID: 26328722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical exposure to native language dialects can improve non-native phonetic discrimination.
    Olmstead AJ; Viswanathan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):725-731. PubMed ID: 29086159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology.
    Golestani N; Zatorre RJ
    Brain Lang; 2009; 109(2-3):55-67. PubMed ID: 18295875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit training of nonnative speech stimuli.
    Vlahou EL; Protopapas A; Seitz AR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 May; 141(2):363-81. PubMed ID: 21910556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of Multiple-Talker Phonetic Identification Training in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller SE; Zhang Y; Nelson PB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 26609904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonetic training and non-native speech perception--New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures.
    Tamminen H; Peltola MS; Kujala T; Näätänen R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jul; 97(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25956191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.