These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25618484)

  • 1. Plastic surgery spin: suppressing clarity.
    Freshwater MF
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):292-4. PubMed ID: 25618484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias against the null hypothesis in maternal-fetal pharmacology and toxicology.
    Koren G
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1997 Jul; 62(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 9246013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ratio of means for analyzing continuous outcomes in meta-analysis performed as well as mean difference methods.
    Friedrich JO; Adhikari NK; Beyene J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 May; 64(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 21447428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A primer in meta-analysis for the plastic surgeon.
    Temple C
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20224326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence-based plastic surgery: controlled trials in three plastic surgical journals (1990-2005).
    Momeni A; Becker A; Antes G; Diener MK; Blümle A; Stark GB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Aug; 61(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 18650619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Researcher allegiance in psychotherapy outcome research: an overview of reviews.
    Munder T; Brütsch O; Leonhart R; Gerger H; Barth J
    Clin Psychol Rev; 2013 Jun; 33(4):501-11. PubMed ID: 23500154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based plastic surgery: controlled trials in three plastic surgical journals (1990 to 2005).
    Momeni A; Becker A; Antes G; Diener MK; Blümle A; Stark BG
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Mar; 62(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 19240528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between research sponsorship and study outcome in plastic surgery literature.
    Momeni A; Becker A; Bannasch H; Antes G; Blümle A; Stark GB
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Dec; 63(6):661-4. PubMed ID: 19887933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hollywood's guidance for improving the quality of plastic surgery articles.
    Freshwater MF
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Jun; 68(6):880-2. PubMed ID: 26005044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems with meta-analysis.
    Herbison P
    N Z Med J; 1999 Feb; 112(1081):38-41. PubMed ID: 10078215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bias in transfusion research: from study design to result reporting.
    Arnold DM
    Transfusion; 2011 Feb; 51(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 21309776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
    Feinstein AR
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of re-randomized data in meta-analysis.
    Hozo I; Djulbegovic B; Clark O; Lyman GH
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 May; 5():17. PubMed ID: 15882470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.