These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Rosetta Structure Prediction as a Tool for Solving Difficult Molecular Replacement Problems. DiMaio F Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1607():455-466. PubMed ID: 28573585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the application of the expected log-likelihood gain to decision making in molecular replacement. Oeffner RD; Afonine PV; Millán C; Sammito M; Usón I; Read RJ; McCoy AJ Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2018 Apr; 74(Pt 4):245-255. PubMed ID: 29652252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unsupervised determination of protein crystal structures. Ufimtsev IS; Levitt M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 May; 116(22):10813-10818. PubMed ID: 31088963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating local backbone structural deviation in homology models. Cardozo T; Batalov S; Abagyan R Comput Chem; 2000 Jan; 24(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 10642877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A log-likelihood-gain intensity target for crystallographic phasing that accounts for experimental error. Read RJ; McCoy AJ Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2016 Mar; 72(Pt 3):375-87. PubMed ID: 26960124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An introduction to molecular replacement. Evans P; McCoy A Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2008 Jan; 64(Pt 1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18094461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of local structural similarity of distant homologues for crystallographic model building from a molecular-replacement solution. Chojnowski G; Choudhury K; Heuser P; Sobolev E; Pereira J; Oezugurel U; Lamzin VS Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2020 Mar; 76(Pt 3):248-260. PubMed ID: 32133989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ab initio solution of macromolecular crystal structures without direct methods. McCoy AJ; Oeffner RD; Wrobel AG; Ojala JR; Tryggvason K; Lohkamp B; Read RJ Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Apr; 114(14):3637-3641. PubMed ID: 28325875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of the assessment: evaluation of the model quality estimates in CASP10. Kryshtafovych A; Barbato A; Fidelis K; Monastyrskyy B; Schwede T; Tramontano A Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):112-26. PubMed ID: 23780644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-throughput 3D structural homology detection via NMR resonance assignment. Langmead CJ; Donald BR Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2004; ():278-89. PubMed ID: 16448021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating local protein model quality: prospects for molecular replacement. Wallner B Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2020 Mar; 76(Pt 3):285-290. PubMed ID: 32133992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Packing as a structural basis of protein stability: understanding mutant properties from wildtype structure. Lee C; Levitt M Pac Symp Biocomput; 1997; ():245-55. PubMed ID: 9390296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved technologies now routinely provide protein NMR structures useful for molecular replacement. Mao B; Guan R; Montelione GT Structure; 2011 Jun; 19(6):757-66. PubMed ID: 21645849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of model refinement in CASP13. Read RJ; Sammito MD; Kryshtafovych A; Croll TI Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1249-1262. PubMed ID: 31365160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of crystal structures of proteins of unknown identity using a marathon molecular replacement procedure: structure of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia phosphate-binding protein. Hatti K; Gulati A; Srinivasan N; Murthy MR Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2016 Oct; 72(Pt 10):1081-1089. PubMed ID: 27710929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]