299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25621078)
1. Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.
Søreide K; Thorsen K; Søreide JA
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2015 Feb; 41(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 25621078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) score: a predictor of mortality following peptic ulcer perforation. A cohort study.
Møller MH; Engebjerg MC; Adamsen S; Bendix J; Thomsen RW
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 May; 56(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 22191386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
Thorsen K; Søreide JA; Søreide K
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2013 Apr; 21():25. PubMed ID: 23574922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of clinical prediction rules in peptic ulcer perforation: an observational study.
Buck DL; Vester-Andersen M; Møller MH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jan; 47(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22126610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Lohsiriwat V; Prapasrivorakul S; Lohsiriwat D
World J Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 18958520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An artificial neural network for predicting the incidence of radiation pneumonitis.
Su M; Miften M; Whiddon C; Sun X; Light K; Marks L
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):318-25. PubMed ID: 15789575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between ulcer site and outcome in complicated peptic ulcer disease: a Danish nationwide cohort study.
Lolle I; Møller MH; Rosenstock SJ
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1165-71. PubMed ID: 27248208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study.
Anbalakan K; Chua D; Pandya GJ; Shelat VG
Int J Surg; 2015 Feb; 14():38-44. PubMed ID: 25560748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of in-hospital mortality after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using an artificial neural network.
Wise ES; Hocking KM; Brophy CM
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jul; 62(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25953014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In-hospital mortality after traumatic brain injury surgery: a nationwide population-based comparison of mortality predictors used in artificial neural network and logistic regression models.
Shi HY; Hwang SL; Lee KT; Lin CL
J Neurosurg; 2013 Apr; 118(4):746-52. PubMed ID: 23373802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neural network prediction of severe lower intestinal bleeding and the need for surgical intervention.
Loftus TJ; Brakenridge SC; Croft CA; Smith RS; Efron PA; Moore FA; Mohr AM; Jordan JR
J Surg Res; 2017 May; 212():42-47. PubMed ID: 28550920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article.
Azimi P; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S; Mohammadi HR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24438428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Artificial Neural Network: A Method for Prediction of Surgery-Related Pressure Injury in Cardiovascular Surgical Patients.
Chen HL; Yu SJ; Xu Y; Yu SQ; Zhang JQ; Zhao JY; Liu P; Zhu B
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018; 45(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 29189496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of community-acquired pneumonia using artificial neural networks.
Heckerling PS; Gerber BS; Tape TG; Wigton RS
Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 12693873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer.
Yamamoto K; Takahashi O; Arioka H; Kobayashi D
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Feb; 18(1):28. PubMed ID: 29448921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement in the Prediction of Ventilator Weaning Outcomes by an Artificial Neural Network in a Medical ICU.
Kuo HJ; Chiu HW; Lee CN; Chen TT; Chang CC; Bien MY
Respir Care; 2015 Nov; 60(11):1560-9. PubMed ID: 26329358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morbidity and mortality of perforated peptic gastroduodenal ulcer following emergency surgery.
Kujath P; Schwandner O; Bruch HP
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2002 Nov; 387(7-8):298-302. PubMed ID: 12447556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of artificial neural networks to establish a predictive mortality risk model in children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit.
Chan CH; Chan EY; Ng DK; Chow PY; Kwok KL
Singapore Med J; 2006 Nov; 47(11):928-34. PubMed ID: 17075658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of outcome in critically ill patients using artificial neural network synthesised by genetic algorithm.
Dybowski R; Weller P; Chang R; Gant V
Lancet; 1996 Apr; 347(9009):1146-50. PubMed ID: 8609749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
