116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25621412)
1. Interfering with memory for faces: The cost of doing two things at once.
Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
Memory; 2016; 24(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 25621412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words.
Fernandes M; Guild E
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 19271812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inverted, Upright, and Blurred Faces Are Not Immune to the Attentional Blink.
Eagles S; Murphy K
Perception; 2016 Aug; 45(8):893-909. PubMed ID: 27060179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.
Wang H; Sun P; Ip C; Zhao X; Fu S
Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1602():75-84. PubMed ID: 25601005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural evidence for the contribution of holistic processing but not attention allocation to the other-race effect on face memory.
Herzmann G; Minor G; Curran T
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):1015-1033. PubMed ID: 29943176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults.
Fernandes MA; Pacurar A; Moscovitch M; Grady C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2452-64. PubMed ID: 16769093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
Boutet I; Lemieux CL; Goulet MA; Collin CA
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The residual protective effects of enactment.
Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():87-101. PubMed ID: 28391135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interfering with free recall of words: Detrimental effects of phonological competition.
Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Priselac S; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():59-71. PubMed ID: 27174519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M; Ziegler M; Grady C
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15817169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
Keyes H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aging Strikes the Self-Face Advantage in Featural Processing.
Qian H; Wang Z; Yan L; Gao X
Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(4):379-390. PubMed ID: 28718751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces.
Itier RJ; Taylor MJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Part and whole face representations in immediate and long-term memory.
Tanaka JW; Heptonstall B; Campbell A
Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():53-61. PubMed ID: 31585389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The generality of the attentional boost effect for famous, unfamiliar, and inverted faces.
Oliver GW; Lee VG
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):234-241. PubMed ID: 37537318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
