These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25621412)

  • 41. Composite faces are not (necessarily) processed coactively: A test using systems factorial technology and logical-rule models.
    Cheng XJ; McCarthy CJ; Wang TSL; Palmeri TJ; Little DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):833-862. PubMed ID: 29683707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Configural processing and face viewpoint.
    McKone E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):310-27. PubMed ID: 18377173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Searching for faces of different ages: Evidence for an experienced-based own-age detection advantage in adults.
    Macchi Cassia V; Proietti V; Gava L; Bricolo E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1037-48. PubMed ID: 25984588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Further studies on the role of attention and stimulus repetition in item-item binding processes in visual working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 30024264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Lateralised repetition priming for featurally and configurally manipulated familiar faces: evidence for differentially lateralised processing mechanisms.
    Bourne VJ; Vladeanu M; Hole GJ
    Laterality; 2009 May; 14(3):287-99. PubMed ID: 18949655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L; Lincoln A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces.
    Rhodes G; Ewing L; Hayward WG; Maurer D; Mondloch CJ; Tanaka JW
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):717-28. PubMed ID: 19228441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and "thatcherized" faces.
    Boutsen L; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Aug; 56(6):955-75. PubMed ID: 12881166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Release from output interference in recognition memory: A test of the attention hypothesis.
    Criss AH; Salomão C; Malmberg KJ; Aue W; Kılıç A; Claridge M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1081-1089. PubMed ID: 28351212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Parketny J; Towler J; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():538-47. PubMed ID: 26169316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Representation of linguistic information determines its susceptibility to memory interference.
    Fernandes MA; Wammes JD; Hsiao JH
    Brain Sci; 2013 Aug; 3(3):1244-60. PubMed ID: 24961528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):513-36. PubMed ID: 10881616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Greater Response Interference to Pain Faces Under Low Perceptual Load Conditions in Adolescents With Impairing Pain: A Role for Poor Attention Control Mechanisms in Pain Disability?
    Lau JYF; Sprecher E; Haas S; Lisk S; Pagliaccio D; Sharpe L; Bar-Haim Y; Pine DS
    J Pain; 2019 Apr; 20(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 30385320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Change detection in an attended face depends on the expectation of the observer.
    Austen EL; Enns JT
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 12678626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration.
    Pichler P; Dosani M; Oruç I; Barton JJ
    Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 21396633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dual-task interference patterns reveal differential processing of upright and inverted faces.
    Hillis SK; Hiscock M; Rexer JL
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Jul; 28(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 7546670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Do patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease present an own-age bias in face recognition?
    Bortolon C; Louche A; Gély-Nargeot MC; Raffard S
    Exp Gerontol; 2015 Oct; 70():46-53. PubMed ID: 26176647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An examination of the processing capacity of features in the Thatcher illusion.
    Donnelly N; Cornes K; Menneer T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1475-87. PubMed ID: 22707354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.