These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25621923)

  • 1. Testing likelihood ratios produced from complex DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Buckleton J; Evett I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():165-171. PubMed ID: 25621923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
    Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Importance sampling allows H
    Taylor D; Curran JM; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():74-81. PubMed ID: 28012376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.
    Riman S; Iyer H; Vallone PM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256714. PubMed ID: 34534241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using continuous DNA interpretation methods to revisit likelihood ratio behaviour.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jul; 11():144-53. PubMed ID: 24727432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.
    Swaminathan H; Garg A; Grgicak CM; Medard M; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():149-160. PubMed ID: 26946255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
    Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpreting a major component from a mixed DNA profile with an unknown number of minor contributors.
    Bille T; Weitz S; Buckleton JS; Bright JA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():150-159. PubMed ID: 30844683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a top-down DNA profile analysis for database searching using a fully continuous probabilistic genotyping model.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Scandrett L; Abarno D; Lee SI; Wivell R; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102479. PubMed ID: 33588348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Complex DNA mixture analysis in a forensic context: evaluating the probative value using a likelihood ratio model.
    Haned H; Benschop CCG; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 May; 16():17-25. PubMed ID: 25485478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of the performance of the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix: Trends in likelihood ratios and analysis of Type I & II errors.
    Benschop CCG; Nijveld A; Duijs FE; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():31-38. PubMed ID: 31212207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Searching mixed DNA profiles directly against profile databases.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Curran J; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():102-10. PubMed ID: 24528588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
    Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. STRmix
    Noël S; Noël J; Granger D; Lefebvre JF; Séguin D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():24-31. PubMed ID: 30947115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to mixtures.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):39-57. PubMed ID: 26160753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the probative value of mixed DNA profiles.
    Kruijver M; Bright JA; Kelly H; Buckleton J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():1-10. PubMed ID: 30913444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.