132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25622841)
1. [Diagnostic value of 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for early cesarean scar pregnancy].
Liu Q; Zhang R; Wang X; Liu K; Bai G; Huang Y; Zhu H; Yan Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 94(45):3589-92. PubMed ID: 25622841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ultrasound in evaluation of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1890-3. PubMed ID: 25056467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography on the detection of cesarean scar pregnancy: A meta-analysis.
Xiao X; Ding R; Peng L; Liu H; Zhu Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Dec; 100(48):e27532. PubMed ID: 35049166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy.
Li H; Liu X; Xie L; Ye Z; Gan L
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():117-122. PubMed ID: 32007793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester.
Timor-Tritsch IE; Monteagudo A; Cali G; El Refaey H; Kaelin Agten A; Arslan AA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):225.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26899908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose cesarean scar pregnancies.
Huang Q; Zhang M; Zhai RY
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Nov; 127(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 25035091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of cases with cesarean scar pregnancy.
Zhang Y; Gu Y; Wang JM; Li Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Jan; 39(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 22640013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cesarean scar pregnancy analysis of 42 cases].
Yin L; Tao X; Zhu YC; Yu XL; Zou YH; Yang HX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):566-9. PubMed ID: 20003781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
Jiao LZ; Zhao J; Wan XR; Liu XY; Feng FZ; Ren T; Xiang Y
Chin Med Sci J; 2008 Mar; 23(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 18437903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic value of transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound combined with color Doppler ultrasound for early cesarean scar pregnancy.
Shi L; Huang L; Liu L; Yang X; Yao D; Chen D; Xiong J; Duan J
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Oct; 10(10):10486-10494. PubMed ID: 34763495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Xiong X; Yan P; Gao C; Sun Q; Xu F
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():4762785. PubMed ID: 27340659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Clinical value of MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy].
Chong Y; Zhang K; Zhou Y; Han J; Zhu F; Guo H; Xiong G
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 49(12):914-8. PubMed ID: 25608992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential Diagnostic Value of Two-dimensional Ultrasound Combined with Three-dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Technology for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Feng C; You L; Zhu X
Curr Med Imaging; 2024; 20():1-6. PubMed ID: 38389350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy among Transvaginal Sonography, Transabdominal Sonography, and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.
Wang K; Jing F
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():9714369. PubMed ID: 35126959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.
Gao L; Huang Z; Zhang X; Zhou N; Huang X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():102-7. PubMed ID: 27014853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy].
Shao HJ; Ma JT; Yang XE; Xu LP; Yang CL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 90(37):2616-9. PubMed ID: 21162927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application and comparative analysis of 3.0T MRI and ultrasound in diagnosing CSP after caesarean section.
Yang D; Zhang Z; Kang Z; Liu Y
Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(4):3806-3810. PubMed ID: 34017569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The diagnostic value of 3.0T MRI in cesarean scar pregnancy.
Guo S; Wang H; Yu X; Yu Y; Wang C
Am J Transl Res; 2021; 13(6):6229-6235. PubMed ID: 34306362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosing early scar pregnancy in the lower uterine segment after cesarean section by intracavitary ultrasound.
Cheng XL; Cao XY; Wang XQ; Lin HL; Fang JC; Wang L
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(2):547-553. PubMed ID: 35097080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of multiparametric MRI in Caesarean section scar characterization and preoperative prediction of scar dehiscence: a prospective study.
Kumar I; Verma A; Matah M; Satpathy G
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jul; 58(7):890-896. PubMed ID: 27799572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
