461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25623709)
1. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of significant tumor in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Abdi H; Pourmalek F; Zargar H; Walshe T; Harris AC; Chang SD; Eddy C; So AI; Gleave ME; Machan L; Goldenberg SL; Black PC
Urology; 2015 Feb; 85(2):423-8. PubMed ID: 25623709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cancer detection rate of prebiopsy MRI with subsequent systematic and targeted biopsy are superior to non-targeting systematic biopsy without MRI in biopsy naïve patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Washino S; Kobayashi S; Okochi T; Kameda T; Konoshi T; Miyagawa T; Takayama T; Morita T
BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):51. PubMed ID: 29843694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.
Costa DN; Kay FU; Pedrosa I; Kolski L; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Hornberger B; Xi Y; Francis F; Rofsky NM
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e15-149.e21. PubMed ID: 27939349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduced Core Targeted (RCT) biopsy: Combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - transrectal ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy with laterally-directed sextant biopsies - An alternative template for prostate fusion biopsy.
Aminsharifi A; Gupta RT; Tsivian E; Sekar S; Sze C; Polascik TJ
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():7-13. PubMed ID: 30599876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confirmatory biopsy of men under active surveillance: extended versus saturation versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Pepe P; Cimino S; Garufi A; Priolo G; Russo GI; Giardina R; Reale G; Pennisi M; Morgia G
Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 28513296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Bonekamp D; Freitag MT; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Hatiboglu G; Boxler S; Pahernik S; Roth W; Roethke MC; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Sep; 19(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 27184812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Boxler S; Kuru TH; Wolf MB; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Steinemann S; Huettenbrink C; Bergstraesser-Gasch C; Klein T; Kesch C; Roethke M; Becker N; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2015 Sep; 18(3):288-96. PubMed ID: 26078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate.
Oberlin DT; Casalino DD; Miller FH; Matulewicz RS; Perry KT; Nadler RB; Kundu S; Catalona WJ; Meeks JJ
Urology; 2016 Jun; 92():75-9. PubMed ID: 26966043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.
Monni F; Fontanella P; Grasso A; Wiklund P; Ou YC; Randazzo M; Rocco B; Montanari E; Bianchi G
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 28488844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy].
Kesch C; Radtke JP; Distler F; Boxler S; Klein T; Hüttenbrink C; Hees K; Roth W; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Urologe A; 2016 Aug; 55(8):1071-7. PubMed ID: 27168038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Under Active Surveillance Undergoing Surveillance Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Renner T; Platzek I; Toma M; Herout R; Baunacke M; Groeben C; Huber J; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2018; 100(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 29339663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histology core-specific evaluation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) standardised scoring system of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Rieker P; Roth W; Fenchel M; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Hadaschik BA
BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1080-7. PubMed ID: 23937255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?
Salami SS; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Ryniker L; Turkbey B; Kavoussi LR; Villani R; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2015 Apr; 115(4):562-70. PubMed ID: 25252133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
