598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25623742)
1. Untreated Gleason Grade Progression on Serial Biopsies during Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Clinical Course and Pathological Outcomes.
Hussein AA; Welty CJ; Ameli N; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Porten SP; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 25623742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence.
Corcoran NM; Hong MK; Casey RG; Hurtado-Coll A; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Hovens CM; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8 Pt 2):E202-10. PubMed ID: 21443656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gleason Upgrading with Time in a Large Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohort.
Jain S; Loblaw A; Vesprini D; Zhang L; Kattan MW; Mamedov A; Jethava V; Sethukavalan P; Yu C; Klotz L
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 25660208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Definitive pathology at radical prostatectomy is commonly favorable in men following initial active surveillance.
Hong SK; Sternberg IA; Keren Paz GE; Kim PH; Touijer KA; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 23954083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Masic S; Cowan JE; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):386-394. PubMed ID: 31158077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of pathological progression among men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance: a sub-analysis of the REDEEM study.
Margel D; Nandy I; Wilson TH; Castro R; Fleshner N
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2039-45. PubMed ID: 23820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Active Surveillance is an Appropriate Management Strategy for a Proportion of Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer by Prostate Specific Antigen Testing.
Overholser S; Nielsen M; Torkko K; Cwilka D; Weaver B; Shi X; Leach RJ; Hernandez J; Huang T; Thompson IM; Thompson IM
J Urol; 2015 Sep; 194(3):680-4. PubMed ID: 25636657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological, oncologic and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy following active surveillance.
Satkunasivam R; Kulkarni GS; Zlotta AR; Kalnin R; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE; Hamilton RJ; Jewett MA; Finelli A
J Urol; 2013 Jul; 190(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 23321581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ
BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 21895937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of pathologic progression on biopsy among men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer: the value of the pattern of surveillance biopsies.
Cary KC; Cowan JE; Sanford M; Shinohara K; Perez N; Chan JM; Meng MV; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 24035632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-Term Outcomes after Deferred Radical Prostatectomy in Men Initially Treated with Active Surveillance.
Godtman RA; Schafferer M; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):779-785. PubMed ID: 29730198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).
El Hajj A; Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2013 Jan; 111(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 22726582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical predictors of Gleason score upgrading: implications for patients considering watchful waiting, active surveillance, or brachytherapy.
Kulkarni GS; Lockwood G; Evans A; Toi A; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Finelli A; Fleshner NE
Cancer; 2007 Jun; 109(12):2432-8. PubMed ID: 17497649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
