These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25624095)

  • 1. Trial-by-trial adjustments in control triggered by incidentally encoded semantic cues.
    Blais C; Harris MB; Sinanian MH; Bunge SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1920-30. PubMed ID: 25624095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Congruency effects in conceptualizing for speech.
    Kuipers JR; La Heij W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2155-68. PubMed ID: 22630114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Depth-of-processing effects on semantic activation deficits in schizophrenia: an electrophysiological investigation.
    Kiang M; Christensen BK; Zipursky RB
    Schizophr Res; 2011 Dec; 133(1-3):91-8. PubMed ID: 21868201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer of location-specific control to untrained locations.
    Weidler BJ; Bugg JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2202-17. PubMed ID: 26800157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the automaticity of semantic processing during task switching.
    Vachon F; Jolicœur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):611-26. PubMed ID: 21981671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The costs of emotional attention: affective processing inhibits subsequent lexico-semantic analysis.
    Ihssen N; Heim S; Keil A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1932-49. PubMed ID: 17892390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search.
    Beesley T; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):709-25. PubMed ID: 21895393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social categories as a context for the allocation of attentional control.
    Cañadas E; Rodríguez-Bailón R; Milliken B; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):934-43. PubMed ID: 22905873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences on the semantic flanker task using transposed-letter target words.
    Judge J; Taylor PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):2008-17. PubMed ID: 22524791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of cueing target location and response mode on interference and negative priming using a visual selection paradigm.
    Richards A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 May; 52(2):449-63. PubMed ID: 10428686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional sensitization of unconscious cognition: task sets modulate subsequent masked semantic priming.
    Kiefer M; Martens U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 Aug; 139(3):464-89. PubMed ID: 20677895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus homogeneity enhances implicit learning: evidence from contextual cueing.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():108-16. PubMed ID: 24603347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic influences from a brief peripheral cue depend on task set.
    Weaver MD; Phillips J; Lauwereyns J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Setting semantics: conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention.
    Goodhew SC; Kendall W; Ferber S; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1577-89. PubMed ID: 24824982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modulating brain mechanisms resolving lexico-semantic Interference during word production: A transcranial direct current stimulation study.
    Henseler I; Mädebach A; Kotz SA; Jescheniak JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 26(7):1403-17. PubMed ID: 24405107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning to selectively attend from context-specific attentional histories: A demonstration and some constraints.
    Crump MJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Mar; 70(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 26372055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word semantics is processed even without attentional effort.
    Relander K; Rämä P; Kujala T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1511-22. PubMed ID: 18823236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual recruitment of cognitive control in preadolescent children and young adults.
    Surrey C; Kretschmer-Trendowicz A; Altgassen M; Fischer R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():189-207. PubMed ID: 30904826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.