These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25625059)

  • 1. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients.
    Reza Hashemian SM; Nouraei N; Razavi SS; Zaker E; Jafari A; Eftekhari P; Radmand G; Mohajerani SA; Radpay B
    Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci; 2014; 4(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 25625059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway Classic™ in terms of ease of insertion and hemodynamic response: A randomized observational study.
    Pratheeba N; Ramya GS; Ranjan RV; Remadevi R
    Anesth Essays Res; 2016; 10(3):521-525. PubMed ID: 27746545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of air-Q™, i-gel™, and laryngeal mask airway supreme™ in adult patients during general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
    Damodaran S; Sethi S; Malhotra SK; Samra T; Maitra S; Saini V
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(4):390-395. PubMed ID: 29033717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective, randomized comparison of the LMA-protector™ and i-gel™ in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
    Chang JE; Kim H; Lee JM; Min SW; Won D; Jun K; Hwang JY
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 31272379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance].
    Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Sayin M; Kokulu T; Öztürk İ
    Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2015; 65(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 26363690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in terms of clinical performance.
    Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Sayin M; Kokulu T; Öztürk İ
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2015; 65(5):343-8. PubMed ID: 26323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. i-gel™ vs. AuraOnce™ laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients.
    Donaldson W; Abraham A; Deighan M; Michalek P
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2011 Jun; 155(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 21804625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of I-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in patients: A meta-analysis.
    Tan Y; Jiang J; Wang R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278871. PubMed ID: 36520843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of supraglottic airway i-gel™ vs. classic laryngeal mask airway in small children.
    Lee JH; Cho HS; Shin WJ; Yang HS
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 66(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 24624270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised trial to compare i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway for airway management in paediatric patients.
    Nirupa R; Gombar S; Ahuja V; Sharma P
    Indian J Anaesth; 2016 Oct; 60(10):726-731. PubMed ID: 27761035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fiberoptic intubation of severely obese patients through supraglottic airway: A prospective, randomized trial of the Ambu
    Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Dave MH; Bruppacher HR
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Feb; 63(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 30088266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised comparison of the i-gel™ and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic™ in infants.
    Kim MS; Oh JT; Min JY; Lee KH; Lee JR
    Anaesthesia; 2014 Apr; 69(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 24641642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel™ and LMA-Supreme™ in paralyzed patients.
    Joly N; Poulin LP; Tanoubi I; Drolet P; Donati F; St-Pierre P
    Can J Anaesth; 2014 Sep; 61(9):794-800. PubMed ID: 25141831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
    Chan WK; Liu CY
    Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the i-gel™ with the AuraGain™ laryngeal mask airways in patients with a simulated cervical immobilization: a randomized controlled trial.
    Hur M; Choi S; Row HS; Kim TK
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2020 Jul; 86(7):727-735. PubMed ID: 32251570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized comparison of the i-gel™, the LMA Supreme™, and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients.
    Russo SG; Cremer S; Galli T; Eich C; Bräuer A; Crozier TA; Bauer M; Strack M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2012 Aug; 12():18. PubMed ID: 22871204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study between I-gel, a new supraglottic airway device, and classical laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized spontaneously ventilated patients.
    Atef HM; Helmy AM; El-Taher EM; Henidak AM
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 21(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 23327031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of i-gel™ and LMA Supreme™ in anesthetized and paralyzed children.
    Kim H; Lee JY; Lee SY; Park SY; Lee SC; Chung CJ
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2014 Nov; 67(5):317-22. PubMed ID: 25473460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Success and Ease of Insertion of ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway versus I-gel™ Insertion by Paramedics in Simulated Difficult Airway Using Cervical Collar in Different Positions in Manikins.
    Gupta A; Kabi A; Gaur D
    Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(4):627-631. PubMed ID: 34349332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.