These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25625133)

  • 61. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up.
    Sartori N; Stolf SC; Silva SB; Lopes GC; Carrilho M
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1188-95. PubMed ID: 24076103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Clinical evaluation of two one-bottle dentin adhesives at three years.
    Swift EJ; Perdigão J; Wilder AD; Heymann HO; Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1117-23. PubMed ID: 11575019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Clinical comparison of bur- and laser-prepared minimally invasive occlusal resin composite restorations: two-year follow-up.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gorucu J
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 20945740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results.
    Fennis WM; Kuijs RH; Roeters FJ; Creugers NH; Kreulen CM
    J Dent Res; 2014 Jan; 93(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 24155264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. One-year clinical evaluation of composite restorations in posterior teeth: effect of adhesive systems.
    Sundfeld RH; Scatolin RS; Oliveira FG; Machado LS; Alexandre RS; Sundefeld ML
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):E1-8. PubMed ID: 22621163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Randomised trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 48-month results.
    Alves dos Santos MP; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20188783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P; Alaerts M; Keulemans F
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y; Lo EC; Fang DT; Wei SH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Activated High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Nanohybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities: A Prospective Clinical Study up to 2 Years.
    Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Kusdemir M; Özsoy A; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):152-160. PubMed ID: 30063305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.
    Poon EC; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1533-40. PubMed ID: 16329416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Posterior composite restorations in primary molars: an in vivo comparison of three restorative techniques.
    Rastelli FP; de Sousa Vieira R; Rastelli MC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 12049083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.