130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25625163)
1. Re: three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.
Wein AJ
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):157-8. PubMed ID: 25625163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the Miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.
Basu M; Duckett J
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2059-64. PubMed ID: 23712578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Nambiar A; Cody JD; Jeffery ST
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; (6):CD008709. PubMed ID: 24880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).
Lo TS; Tan YL; Wu PY; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Al-Kharabsheh A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():91-7. PubMed ID: 25265496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TVT Abbrevo and Miniarc suburethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence - A randomised controlled trial.
Melendez-Munoz J; Braverman M; Rosamilia A; Young N; Leitch A; Lee JK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Nov; 230():141-146. PubMed ID: 30286363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of female stress urinary incontinence using suburethral slings: comparative, retrospective, observational study of two surgical techniques.
Castroviejo-Royo F; Martinez-Sagarra-Oceja JM; Marina-García-Tuñón C; Conde-Redondo C; Rodríguez-Toves LA; González-Tejero C
Actas Urol Esp; 2013 Oct; 37(9):549-53. PubMed ID: 23618512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ford AA; Ogah JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 26220506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
Rehman H; Bezerra CC; Bruschini H; Cody JD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jan; (1):CD001754. PubMed ID: 21249648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jun; 27(6):871-7. PubMed ID: 26670576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: the single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings.
Pushkar D
Eur Urol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):218. PubMed ID: 22122871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Place of the mini-sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence].
Castellier C; Doucède G; Debodinance P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2013 Nov; 42(7):639-46. PubMed ID: 23973118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford AA; Rogerson L; Cody JD; Ogah J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; (7):CD006375. PubMed ID: 26130017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retropubic versus Transobturator Mid Urethral Slings in Patients at High Risk for Recurrent Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim A; Kim MS; Park YJ; Choi WS; Park HK; Paick SH; Kim HG
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):132-142. PubMed ID: 30865553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.
Dogan O; Kaya AE; Pulatoglu C; Basbug A; Yassa M
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29549394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized prospective study comparing Monarc and Miniarc suburethral slings.
Foote A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jan; 41(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 25363659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ogah J; Cody JD; Rogerson L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Oct; (4):CD006375. PubMed ID: 19821363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence.
Hinoul P; Vervest HA; den Boon J; Venema PL; Lakeman MM; Milani AL; Roovers JP
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1356-62. PubMed ID: 21334682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings.
De Ridder D; Berkers J; Deprest J; Verguts J; Ost D; Hamid D; Van der Aa F
Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Jul; 21(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 20204323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A meta-analysis of the performance of retropubic mid urethral slings versus transobturator mid urethral slings.
Seklehner S; Laudano MA; Xie D; Chughtai B; Lee RK
J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):909-15. PubMed ID: 25281779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
