These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25625336)

  • 1. Forceps: towards obsolescence or revival?
    Dietz HP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 25625336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland's forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes.
    Al Wattar BH; Al Wattar B; Gallos I; Pirie AM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 26485456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.
    Gauthaman N; Henry D; Ster IC; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?
    Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
    Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL
    Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W
    East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist].
    Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S
    Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    BJOG; 2023 Jul; 130(8):856-864. PubMed ID: 36694989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
    Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK
    BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The place of Kielland's forceps in reducing caesarean section rates.
    Balchandra P; Marsh F; Landon C
    Pract Midwife; 2015 Apr; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 26328462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study.
    Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ
    BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four-dimensional sonographic evaluation of avulsion of the levator ani according to delivery mode.
    Cassadó Garriga J; Pessarrodona Isern A; Espuña Pons M; Duran Retamal M; Felgueroso Fabrega A; Rodriguez Carballeira M; Jordà Santamaria I
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 21837763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
    Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries.
    Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean section versus forceps-assisted vaginal birth: it's time to include pelvic injury in the risk-benefit equation.
    Farrell SA
    CMAJ; 2002 Feb; 166(3):337-8. PubMed ID: 11868644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
    Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum predictors of maternal levator ani injury.
    Caudwell-Hall J; Kamisan Atan I; Martin A; Guzman Rojas R; Langer S; Shek K; Dietz HP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Apr; 96(4):426-431. PubMed ID: 28117880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Kielland's forceps: association with neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    Chiswick ML; James DK
    Br Med J; 1979 Jan; 1(6155):7-9. PubMed ID: 760969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.