These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25625686)

  • 1. Direct Reading Particle Counters: Calibration Verification and Multiple Instrument Agreement via Bump Testing.
    Jankovic J; Zontek TL; Ogle BR; Hollenbeck S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(7):D116-22. PubMed ID: 25625686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Workplace aerosol mass concentration measurement using optical particle counters.
    Görner P; Simon X; Bémer D; Lidén G
    J Environ Monit; 2012 Feb; 14(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 22009365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a condensation particle counter and an optical particle counter to assess the number concentration of engineered nanoparticles.
    Schmoll LH; Peters TM; O'Shaughnessy PT
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Sep; 7(9):535-45. PubMed ID: 20614365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the TSI Model 8520 and Grimm Series 1.108 portable aerosol instruments used to monitor particulate matter in an iron foundry.
    Cheng YH
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):157-68. PubMed ID: 18188737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors.
    Asbach C; Kaminski H; von Barany D; Kuhlbusch TA; Monz C; Dziurowitz N; Pelzer J; Vossen K; Berlin K; Dietrich S; Götz U; Kiesling HJ; Schierl R; Dahmann D
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):606-21. PubMed ID: 22752099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metrological assessment of a portable analyzer for monitoring the particle size distribution of ultrafine particles.
    Stabile L; Cauda E; Marini S; Buonanno G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Aug; 58(7):860-76. PubMed ID: 24817159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Development and Performance Evaluation of a Supermicron Particle Generation System for Aerosol Instrument Calibration].
    Chen XT; Jiang JK; Deng JG; Duan L; Hao JM
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2016 Mar; 37(3):789-94. PubMed ID: 27337867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
    Stanier CO; Lee SR;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles in the workplace: exploring sampling techniques and strategies.
    Brouwer DH; Gijsbers JH; Lurvink MW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jul; 48(5):439-53. PubMed ID: 15240340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining PM2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols.
    Dacunto PJ; Klepeis NE; Cheng KC; Acevedo-Bolton V; Jiang RT; Repace JL; Ott WR; Hildemann LM
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2015 Nov; 17(11):1959-66. PubMed ID: 26487426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of size-specific particulate matter emission rates for a simulated medical laser procedure--a pilot study.
    Lopez R; Lacey SE; Lippert JF; Liu LC; Esmen NA; Conroy LM
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):514-24. PubMed ID: 25587187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the DiSCmini aerosol monitor to a handheld condensation particle counter and a scanning mobility particle sizer for submicrometer sodium chloride and metal aerosols.
    Mills JB; Park JH; Peters TM
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(5):250-8. PubMed ID: 23473056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A novel size-selective airborne particle size fractionating instrument for health risk evaluation.
    Gorbunov B; Priest ND; Muir RB; Jackson PR; Gnewuch H
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Apr; 53(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 19279163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An occupational exposure assessment for engineered nanoparticles used in semiconductor fabrication.
    Shepard MN; Brenner S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2014 Mar; 58(2):251-65. PubMed ID: 24284882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a tractor cab using real-time aerosol counting instrumentation.
    Hall RM; Heitbrink WA; Reed LD
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Jan; 17(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11800406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrafine particles emitted by flame and electric arc guns for thermal spraying of metals.
    Bémer D; Régnier R; Subra I; Sutter B; Lecler MT; Morele Y
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Aug; 54(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 20685717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.