These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25625835)

  • 1. A proposal for practice nurse appraisal: report of a pilot project.
    Horman L; Hellens J; Baker M
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):276-80. PubMed ID: 25625835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the experiences of general practice nurse peer appraisers.
    Ferguson J; Kennedy S
    Educ Prim Care; 2014 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 25625834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The peer review pilot project: a potential system to support GP appraisal in NHS Scotland?
    Murie J; McCrae J; Bowie P
    Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jan; 20(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 19618650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute back pain management in primary care: a qualitative pilot study of the feasibility of a nurse-led service in general practice.
    Breen A; Carr E; Mann E; Crossen-White H
    J Nurs Manag; 2004 May; 12(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 15089958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'A higher level of practice': what is it and what does it involve?
    Madge S; Khair K
    Paediatr Nurs; 2001 Jul; 13(6):31-2. PubMed ID: 12025698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A competency-based approach to public health nursing performance appraisal.
    Kalb KB; Cherry NM; Kauzloric J; Brender A; Green K; Miyagawa L; Shinoda-Mettler A
    Public Health Nurs; 2006; 23(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 16684187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers.
    Bowie P; Cameron N; Staples I; McMillan R; McKay J; Lough M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2009 Jul; 59(564):484-9. PubMed ID: 19566997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The attitude of general practitioners towards practice nurses: a pilot study. The Georgian Research Society.
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Jan; 41(342):19-22. PubMed ID: 2003952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review.
    Micheli AJ; Modest S
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1995 Jun; 30(2):197-210. PubMed ID: 7777403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Annual trainer peer-review: impact on educational practice and sense of community.
    Sneddon A; MacVicar R
    Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 26954236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of peer assessment and peer review in nursing.
    Gopee N
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Jan 25-Feb 7; 10(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 12170494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefits of appraisal as perceived by general practitioners.
    Mugweni K; Kibble S; Conlon M
    Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 22413660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using clinical audit in practice: a pilot peer review project.
    Holt VP; Earp DP
    Prim Dent Care; 1996 Sep; 3(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 10332335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
    Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice nurse appraisal: evaluation report.
    Murie J; Wilson A; Cerinus M
    Educ Prim Care; 2009 Jul; 20(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 19689850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review in nursing and midwifery: a literature review.
    Rout A; Roberts P
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Feb; 17(4):427-42. PubMed ID: 17419775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can nurse practitioners provide equivalent care to GPs? Nurse practitioners increase access to quality health care for many patients.
    Gupta R; Gupta S
    BMJ; 2002 Jul; 325(7356):166. PubMed ID: 12134861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Staff nurses transform peer review.
    Shaffer C; Ganger M; Glover C
    J Nurs Adm; 2011 May; 41(5):201-3. PubMed ID: 21519205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ideas for appraisal.
    Holden J
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 Sep; 21(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 20868549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality in paediatric anaesthesia: a pilot study of interdepartmental peer review.
    Crean PM; Stokes MA; Williamson C; Hatch DJ
    Anaesthesia; 2003 Jun; 58(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 12846618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.