These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25626559)

  • 1. Penalised logistic regression and dynamic prediction for discrete-time recurrent event data.
    Elgmati E; Fiaccone RL; Henderson R; Matthews JN
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Oct; 21(4):542-60. PubMed ID: 25626559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
    Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.
    Greenland S; Mansournia MA
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3133-43. PubMed ID: 26011599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
    Rahman MS; Sultana M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
    Heinze G; Puhr R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Firth adjusted score function for monotone likelihood in the mixture cure fraction model.
    Almeida FM; Colosimo EA; Mayrink VD
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2021 Jan; 27(1):131-155. PubMed ID: 33184683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of the bias corrected estimates in logistic regression.
    Maiti T; Pradhan V
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):621-34. PubMed ID: 18375454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
    Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.
    Pavlou M; Ambler G; Seaman S; De Iorio M; Omar RZ
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1159-77. PubMed ID: 26514699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A weighted Cox model for modelling time-dependent exposures in the analysis of case-control studies.
    Leffondre K; Wynant W; Cao Z; Abrahamowicz M; Heinze G; Siemiatycki J
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):839-50. PubMed ID: 20213717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ties between event times and jump times in the Cox model.
    Xin X; Horrocks J; Darlington GA
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun; 32(14):2374-89. PubMed ID: 23172770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Median bias reduction in random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Kyriakou S; Kosmidis I; Sartori N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1622-1636. PubMed ID: 29717942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Point estimation of the 100
    Ma Y; Su Y; Wang P; Yin P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 Aug; 33(8):1331-1341. PubMed ID: 38865137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
    Heinze G; Dunkler D
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum likelihood, profile likelihood, and penalized likelihood: a primer.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 179(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 24173548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum likelihood estimation of the kappa coefficient from bivariate logistic regression.
    Shoukri MM; Mian IU
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1409-19. PubMed ID: 8841651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A partial likelihood approach to smooth estimation of dynamic covariate effects using penalised splines.
    Brown D; Kauermann G; Ford I
    Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 17623348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal quantile regression in the presence of informative dropout through longitudinal-survival joint modeling.
    Farcomeni A; Viviani S
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1199-213. PubMed ID: 25488110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of penalised survival methods for developing prognostic models with rare events.
    Ambler G; Seaman S; Omar RZ
    Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1150-61. PubMed ID: 21997569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.