These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25627887)

  • 1. Influence of cortical thickness on the stability of mini-implants with microthreads.
    Vilani GN; Ruellas AC; Mattos CT; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25627887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Insertion torque versus mechanical resistance of mini-implants inserted in different cortical thickness.
    Santos RF; Ruellas AC; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):90-4. PubMed ID: 25162571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insertional torque and axial pull-out strength of mini-implants in mandibles of dogs.
    Salmória KK; Tanaka OM; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; de Souza LT; Maruo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e15-22. PubMed ID: 18538236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs.
    da Cunha AC; Marquezan M; Lima I; Lopes RT; Nojima LI; Sant'Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical influence of thread pitch on orthodontic mini-implant stability.
    Cunha AC; Freitas AO; Marquezan M; Nojima LI
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insertion Torques of Self-Drilling Mini-Implants in Simulated Mandibular Bone: Assessment of Potential for Implant Fracture.
    Hosein YK; Smith A; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):e57-64. PubMed ID: 27183083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insertion torque, flexural strength and surface alterations of stainless steel and titanium alloy orthodontic mini-implants: an in vitro study.
    Puls GL; Marañón-Vásquez GA; Ramos CAV; Reis CLB; Reis ACD; Stuani MBS; Romano FL; Matsumoto MAN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(2):e2423282. PubMed ID: 38775601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Holm L; Cunningham SJ; Petrie A; Cousley RR
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):1022-8. PubMed ID: 22578282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical stability and clinical applicability assessment of novel orthodontic mini-implant design.
    Song HN; Hong C; Banh R; Ohebsion T; Asatrian G; Leung HY; Wu BM; Moon W
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):832-41. PubMed ID: 23627420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insertion torque, pull-out strength and cortical bone thickness in contact with orthodontic mini-implants at different insertion angles.
    Meira TM; Tanaka OM; Ronsani MM; Maruo IT; Guariza-Filho O; Camargo ES; Maruo H
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Dec; 35(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 23382467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic micro-implants with different diameters.
    Chen Y; Kyung HM; Gao L; Yu WJ; Bae EJ; Kim SM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):821-7. PubMed ID: 20578851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.