552 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25628079)
1. Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.
Rodriguez-Cardenas YA; Arriola-Guillen LE; Flores-Mir C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):46-53. PubMed ID: 25628079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of mandibular volume using cone-beam computed tomography and correlation with cephalometric values.
Katayama K; Yamaguchi T; Sugiura M; Haga S; Maki K
Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23985034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Volume and Height of the Coronoid Process in Patients With Different Facial Types and Skeletal Classes: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
Gomes AF; Nejaim Y; Brasil DM; Groppo FC; Ferreira Caria PH; Haiter Neto F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1395.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25976692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway volume in adults with anterior position of the mandible.
Hong JS; Oh KM; Kim BR; Kim YJ; Park YH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e161-9. PubMed ID: 21967954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships.
Hurmerinta K; Rahkamo A; Haavikko K
Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Jun; 105(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 9249188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of masseter muscle morphology in different types of malocclusions using cone beam computed tomography.
Becht MP; Mah J; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 24456631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prevalence of TMJ osteoarthritis in asymptomatic patients with dentofacial deformities: a cone-beam CT study.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Neimane L; Ragovska I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 41(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 22464854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphometry of the cranial base and the cranial-cervical-mandibular system in young patients with type II, division 1 malocclusion, using tomographic cone beam.
Bedoya A; Landa Nieto Z; Zuluaga LL; Rocabado M
Cranio; 2014 Jul; 32(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 25000162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging-verified temporomandibular joint disk displacement in relation to sagittal and vertical jaw deformities.
Jung WS; Kim H; Jeon DM; Mah SJ; Ahn SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1108-15. PubMed ID: 23618835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the Beta angle.
Baik CY; Ververidou M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 15224065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidence of bridging and dimensions of sella turcica in Class I and III Turkish adult female patients.
Marşan G; Öztaş E
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 19582250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
Zheng ZH; Yamaguchi T; Kurihara A; Li HF; Maki K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Feb; 17(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24033888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis.
Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Evaluated by limited cone-beam computed tomography.
Kurusu A; Horiuchi M; Soma K
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1063-9. PubMed ID: 19852595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.
Olbrisch C; Santander P; Moser N; Klenke D; Meyer-Marcotty P; Quast A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Mar; 85(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 36018344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of intended manual condylar positioning on skeletal and dental changes in Skeletal Class III deformities: CBCT-generated half-cephalograms.
Hwang DS; Kim YI; Lee KM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 23434240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
