These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25628186)
1. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis. Li XT; Zhang XY; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5333. PubMed ID: 27858916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings]. Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer. Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis. de Jong EA; ten Berge JC; Dwarkasing RS; Rijkers AP; van Eijck CH Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 26619929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Lahaye MJ; Engelen SM; Nelemans PJ; Beets GL; van de Velde CJ; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2005 Aug; 26(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 16152740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of lymph node status in rectal cancer by imaging]. Wang Y Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 27353097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating lymph node eradication after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Ryu KH; Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Paik JH; Lim YJ; Lee KH Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 25638800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of four imaging modalities in diagnosing lymph node involvement in rectal cancer: an overview and adjusted indirect comparison. Gao Y; Li J; Ma X; Wang J; Wang B; Tian J; Chen G Clin Exp Med; 2019 May; 19(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 30900099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis. Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUS-FNA assessment of extramesenteric lymph node status in primary rectal cancer. Gleeson FC; Clain JE; Rajan E; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Levy MJ Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Oct; 74(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 21839439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and endoluminal ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Zhao RS; Wang H; Zhou ZY; Zhou Q; Mulholland MW Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Mar; 57(3):388-95. PubMed ID: 24509465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Puli SR; Reddy JB; Bechtold ML; Choudhary A; Antillon MR; Brugge WR Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1255-65. PubMed ID: 19219506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer]. Guo F; Ren J; Wang S; Dai W; Ma N Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Bianchi P; Ceriani C; Palmisano A; Pompili G; Passoni GR; Rottoli M; Cappellani A; Montorsi M Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of preoperative local and distant staging in rectal cancer. Engelen SM; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 17341902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]