387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25628186)
1. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: A meta-analysis.
Li XT; Zhang XY; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5333. PubMed ID: 27858916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of magnetic resonance (0,5 T), computed tomography, and endorectal ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of neoplasms of the rectum-sigma. Correlation with surgical and anatomopathologic findings].
Golfieri R; Giampalma E; Leo P; Colecchia A; Selleri S; Poggioli G; Gandolfi L; Gozzetti G; Trebbi F; Russo A
Radiol Med; 1993 Jun; 85(6):773-83. PubMed ID: 8337435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endorectal coil MRI in local staging of rectal cancer.
Torricelli P; Lo Russo S; Pecchi A; Luppi G; Cesinaro AM; Romagnoli R
Radiol Med; 2002; 103(1-2):74-83. PubMed ID: 11859303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The accuracy of MRI, endorectal ultrasonography, and computed tomography in predicting the response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative therapy: A metaanalysis.
de Jong EA; ten Berge JC; Dwarkasing RS; Rijkers AP; van Eijck CH
Surgery; 2016 Mar; 159(3):688-99. PubMed ID: 26619929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Lahaye MJ; Engelen SM; Nelemans PJ; Beets GL; van de Velde CJ; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2005 Aug; 26(4):259-68. PubMed ID: 16152740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EUS versus magnetic resonance imaging in staging rectal adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Chan BPH; Patel R; Mbuagbaw L; Thabane L; Yaghoobi M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Aug; 90(2):196-203.e1. PubMed ID: 31004599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Assessment of lymph node status in rectal cancer by imaging].
Wang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 27353097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.
Meyenberger C; Huch Böni RA; Bertschinger P; Zala GF; Klotz HP; Krestin GP
Endoscopy; 1995 Sep; 27(7):469-79. PubMed ID: 8565885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluating lymph node eradication after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Ryu KH; Kim SH; Yoon JH; Lee Y; Paik JH; Lim YJ; Lee KH
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 25638800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of four imaging modalities in diagnosing lymph node involvement in rectal cancer: an overview and adjusted indirect comparison.
Gao Y; Li J; Ma X; Wang J; Wang B; Tian J; Chen G
Clin Exp Med; 2019 May; 19(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 30900099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.
Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EUS-FNA assessment of extramesenteric lymph node status in primary rectal cancer.
Gleeson FC; Clain JE; Rajan E; Topazian MD; Wang KK; Levy MJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Oct; 74(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 21839439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Restaging of locally advanced rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and endoluminal ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Zhao RS; Wang H; Zhou ZY; Zhou Q; Mulholland MW
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Mar; 57(3):388-95. PubMed ID: 24509465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal methods for staging rectal cancer.
Muthusamy VR; Chang KJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Nov; 13(22 Pt 2):6877s-84s. PubMed ID: 18006793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Puli SR; Reddy JB; Bechtold ML; Choudhary A; Antillon MR; Brugge WR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1255-65. PubMed ID: 19219506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer].
Guo F; Ren J; Wang S; Dai W; Ma N
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 May; 94(17):1318-21. PubMed ID: 25142852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective comparison of endorectal ultrasound and pelvic magnetic resonance in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Bianchi P; Ceriani C; Palmisano A; Pompili G; Passoni GR; Rottoli M; Cappellani A; Montorsi M
Ann Ital Chir; 2006; 77(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16910358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of preoperative local and distant staging in rectal cancer.
Engelen SM; Beets GL; Beets-Tan RG
Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 17341902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
